Boolean Satisfiability via Imitation Learning
Zewei Zhang, Huan Liu, Yuanhao Yu, Jun Chen, Xiangyu Xu
Abstract
We propose ImitSAT, a branching policy for conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers based on imitation learning for the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT). Unlike previous methods that predict instance-level signals to improve CDCL branching indirectly, or rely on reinforcement learning and insufficient CDCL information to enhance branching, ImitSAT learns from expert KeyTrace that collapses a full run into the sequence of surviving decisions. Replaying a KeyTrace on the same instance is nearly conflict-free, providing dense decision-level supervision and directly reducing propagations -- the dominant contributor to wall-clock time. This prefix-conditioned supervision enables ImitSAT to reproduce high-quality branches without exploration, yielding faster convergence, stable training, and seamless integration into CDCL. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ImitSAT reduces propagation counts and runtime, outperforming state-of-the-art learned approaches. We released the source code and trained model at https://github.com/zewei-Zhang/ImitSAT
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d60705c1-d1dc-46c4-ac7b-ace465021182Builds on12
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Parameterizing Branch-and-Bound Search Trees to Learn Branching PoliciesGiulia Zarpellon, Jason Jo, Andrea Lodi, Yoshua BengioAAAI 2021 · 123 citations
- General-purpose, long-context autoregressive modeling with Perceiver ARCurtis Hawthorne, Andrew Jaegle, Catalina Cangea, Sebastian Borgeaud et al.ICML 2022 · 83 citations
- Can Q-Learning with Graph Networks Learn a Generalizable Branching Heuristic for a SAT Solver?Vitaly Kurin, Saad Godil, Shimon Whiteson, Bryan CatanzaroNeurIPS 2020 · 77 citations
- Predicting Propositional Satisfiability via End-to-End LearningChris Cameron, Rex Chen, Jason S. Hartford, Kevin Leyton-BrownAAAI 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- Guiding CDCL SAT Search via Random Exploration amid Conflict DepressionMd. Solimul Chowdhury, Martin Müller, Jia-Huai YouAAAI 2020 · 5 citations
- Towards Practical Privacy-Preserving SAT SolvingGefei Tan, Wenhao Zhang, Timos Antonopoulos, Ruzica Piskac et al.CCS 2026
- Runtime vs. Extracted Proof Size: An Exponential Gap for CDCL on QBFsOlaf Beyersdorff, Benjamin Böhm, Meena MahajanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- NeuroSelect: Learning to Select Clauses in SAT SolversHongduo Liu, Peng Xu, Yuan Pu, Lihao Yin et al.DAC 2024 · 2 citations
- X-SAT: An Efficient Circuit-Based SAT SolverYuhang Qian, Zhihan Chen, Xindi Zhang, Shaowei CaiDAC 2025 · 4 citations
