Practical Settlement Bounds for Proof-of-Work Blockchains
Peter Gazi, Ling Ren, Alexander Russell
Abstract
Nakamoto proof-of-work ledger consensus currently underlies the majority of deployed cryptocurrencies and smart-contract blockchains. While a long and fruitful line of work has succeeded to identify its exact security region-that is, the set of parametrizations under which it possesses asymptotic security-the existing theory does not provide concrete settlement time guarantees that are tight enough to inform practice. In this work we provide a new approach for obtaining concrete and practical settlement time guarantees suitable for reasoning about deployed systems. We give an efficient method for computing explicit upper bounds on settlement time as a function of primary system parameters: honest and adversarial computational power and a bound on network delays. We implement this computational method and provide a comprehensive sample of concrete bounds for several settings of interest. We also analyze a well-known attack strategy to provide lower bounds on the settlement times. For Bitcoin, for example, our upper and lower bounds are within 90 seconds of each other for 1-hour settlement assuming 10 second network delays and a 10% adversary. In comparison, the best prior result has a gap of 2 hours in the upper and lower bounds with the same parameters.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6811ef31-d51d-4dba-b6e2-c0347c07c10eCited by top-tier papers3
- Practical Settlement Bounds for Longest-Chain ConsensusPeter Gazi, Ling Ren, Alexander RussellCRYPTO 2023 · 3 citations
- How to Beat Nakamoto in the RaceShu-Jie Cao, Dongning GuoCCS 2025
- Manifoldchain: Maximizing Blockchain Throughput via Bandwidth-Clustered ShardingChunjiang Che, Songze Li, Xuechao WangNDSS 2025
Builds on5
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell et al.CCS 2018 · 306 citations
- Prism: Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical LimitsVivek Kumar Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti et al.CCS 2019 · 256 citations
- A Better Method to Analyze Blockchain ConsistencyLucianna Kiffer, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Abhi ShelatCCS 2018 · 149 citations
- Everything is a Race and Nakamoto Always WinsAmir Dembo, Sreeram Kannan, Ertem Nusret Tas, David Tse et al.CCS 2020 · 3 citations
- Tight Consistency Bounds for BitcoinPeter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander RussellCCS 2020
Related papers
- Resource-Restricted Cryptography: Revisiting MPC Bounds in the Proof-of-Work EraJuan A. Garay, Aggelos Kiayias, Rafail M. Ostrovsky, Giorgos Panagiotakos et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 22 citations
- Larger-scale Nakamoto-style Blockchains Don't Necessarily Offer Better SecurityJannik Albrecht, Sébastien Andreina, Frederik Armknecht, Ghassan Karame et al.S&P 2024 · 5 citations
- Nakamoto Consensus under Bounded Processing CapacityLucianna Kiffer, Joachim Neu, Srivatsan Sridhar, Aviv Zohar et al.CCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Modeling the Impact of Network Connectivity on Consensus Security of Proof-of-Work BlockchainYang Xiao, Ning Zhang, Wenjing Lou, Y. Thomas HouINFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
- Resilient Alerting Protocols for BlockchainsMarwa Mouallem, Lorenz Breidenbach, Ittay Eyal, Ari JuelsCCS 2026
