Manifoldchain: Maximizing Blockchain Throughput via Bandwidth-Clustered Sharding
Chunjiang Che, Songze Li, Xuechao Wang
Abstract
Bandwidth limitation is the major bottleneck that hinders scaling throughput of proof-of-work blockchains. To guarantee security, the mining rate of the blockchain is determined by the miners with the lowest bandwidth, resulting in an inefficient bandwidth utilization among fast miners. We propose Manifoldchain, an innovative blockchain sharding protocol that alleviates the impact of slow miners to maximize blockchain throughput. Manifoldchain utilizes a bandwidth-clustered shard formation mechanism that groups miners with similar bandwidths into the same shard. Consequently, this approach enables us to set an optimal mining rate for each shard based on its bandwidth, effectively reducing the waiting time caused by slow miners. Nevertheless, the adversary could corrupt miners with similar bandwidths, thereby concentrating hashing power and potentially creating an adversarial majority within a single shard. To counter this adversarial strategy, we introduce sharing mining, allowing the honest mining power of the entire network to participate in the secure ledger formation of each shard, thereby achieving the same level of security as an unsharded blockchain. Additionally, we introduce an asynchronous atomic commitment mechanism to ensure transaction atomicity across shards with various mining rates. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that Manifoldchain scales linearly in throughput with the increase in shard numbers and inversely with network delay in each shard. We implement a full system prototype of Manifoldchain, comprehensively evaluated on both simulated and real-world testbeds. These experiments validate its vertical scalability with network bandwidth and horizontal scalability with network size, achieving a substantial improvement of 186% in throughput over baseline sharding protocols, for scenarios where bandwidths of miners range from 5Mbps to 60Mbps.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d998e24f-5df7-4522-91da-080791d90239Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open BlockchainsLoi Luu, Viswesh Narayanan, Chaodong Zheng, Kunal Baweja et al.CCS 2016 · 1,392 citations
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly et al.S&P 2018 · 1,145 citations
- RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full ShardingMahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi, Mariana RaykovaCCS 2018 · 1,084 citations
- Centrally Banked CryptocurrenciesGeorge Danezis, Sarah MeiklejohnNDSS 2016 · 305 citations
- Narwhal and Tusk: a DAG-based mempool and efficient BFT consensusGeorge Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander SpiegelmanEuroSys 2022 · 259 citations
Related papers
- CoChain: High Concurrency Blockchain Sharding via Consensus on ConsensusMingzhe Li, You Lin, Jin Zhang, Wei WangINFOCOM 2023 · 42 citations
- ShardTree: An Efficient Cross-Shard Protocol via Multi-party Virtual Payment ChannelQiushi Wei, Ruozhou Yu, Xiaojian Wang, Dejun Yang et al.INFOCOM 2026
- OHIE: Blockchain Scaling Made SimpleHaifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolic, Ruomu Hou, Prateek SaxenaS&P 2020 · 166 citations
- On Sharding Across Heterogeneous BlockchainsYuechen Tao, Bo Li, Baochun LiICDE 2023 · 12 citations
- Realizing Corrupted-Shard Tolerance: A Sharding Blockchain with Preserving Global ResilienceYizhong Liu, Andi Liu, Zhuocheng Pan, Yuxuan Hu et al.CCS 2025 · 1 citation
