SaySelf: Teaching LLMs to Express Confidence with Self-Reflective Rationales

Large language models (LLMs) often generate inaccurate or fabricated information and generally fail to indicate their confidence, which limits their broader applications.Previous work has elicited confidence from LLMs by direct or self-consistency prompting, or constructing specific datasets for supervised finetuning.The prompting-based approaches have inferior performance, and the training-based approaches are limited to binary or inaccurate group-level confidence estimates.In this work, we present SaySelf, a novel training framework that teaches LLMs to express more fine-grained confidence estimates.In addition, beyond the confidence scores, SaySelf initiates the process of directing LLMs to produce selfreflective rationales that clearly identify gaps in their parametric knowledge and explain their uncertainty.This is achieved by using an LLM to automatically summarize the uncertainties in specific knowledge via natural language.The summarization is based on the analysis of the inconsistency in multiple sampled reasoning chains, and the resulting data is utilized for supervised fine-tuning.Moreover, we utilize reinforcement learning with a meticulously crafted reward function to calibrate the confidence estimates, motivating LLMs to deliver accurate, high-confidence predictions and to penalize overconfidence in erroneous outputs.Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of SaySelf in reducing the confidence calibration error and maintaining the task performance.The generated self-reflective rationales are also reasonable and can further contribute to the calibration.The code is made public at https://github.com/xu1868/SaySelf. Direct Prompting /