Lune

ICLR2026Top-tier venue

Rewarding Doubt: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Calibrated Confidence Expression of Large Language Models

David Bani-Harouni, Chantal Pellegrini, Paul Stangel, Ege Özsoy, Kamilia Zaripova, Nassir Navab, Matthias Keicher

2026Year
49Citations
7Top-tier citations

Abstract

A safe and trustworthy use of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires an accurate expression of confidence in their answers. We propose a novel Reinforcement Learning approach that allows to directly fine-tune LLMs to express calibrated confidence estimates alongside their answers to factual questions. Our method optimizes a reward based on the logarithmic scoring rule, explicitly penalizing both over- and under-confidence. This encourages the model to align its confidence estimates with the actual predictive accuracy. The optimal policy under our reward design would result in perfectly calibrated confidence expressions. Unlike prior approaches that decouple confidence estimation from response generation, our method integrates confidence calibration seamlessly into the generative process of the LLM. Empirically, we demonstrate that models trained with our approach exhibit substantially improved calibration and generalize to unseen tasks without further fine-tuning, suggesting the emergence of general confidence awareness. Our code is available at https://github.com/pasta99/RewardingDoubt.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 1b18d960-0eb6-45da-9702-7b391c97a712

Cited by top-tier papers7

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on13

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines