Miner: Mining Intrinsic Mastery for Data-Efficient RL in Large Reasoning Models
Shuyang Jiang, Yuhao Wang, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, Yu Wang
Abstract
Current critic-free RL methods for large reasoning models suffer from severe inefficiency when training on positive homogeneous prompts (where all rollouts are correct), resulting in waste of rollouts due to zero advantage estimates. We introduce a radically simple yet powerful solution to Mine intrinsic mastery (Miner), that repurposes the policy's intrinsic uncertainty as a self-supervised reward signal, with no external supervision, auxiliary models, or additional inference cost. Our method pioneers two key innovations: (1) a token-level focal credit assignment mechanism that dynamically amplifies gradients on critical uncertain tokens while suppressing overconfident ones, and (2) adaptive advantage calibration to seamlessly integrate intrinsic and verifiable rewards. Evaluated across six reasoning benchmarks on Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B base models, Miner achieves state-of-the-art performance among the other four algorithms, yielding up to 4.58 absolute gains in Pass@1 and 6.66 gains in Pass@K compared to GRPO. Comparison with other methods targeted at exploration enhancement further discloses the superiority of the two newly proposed innovations. This demonstrates that latent uncertainty exploitation is both necessary and sufficient for efficient and scalable RL training of reasoning models. Code is available at https://github.com/pixas/Miner.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 476d9eba-0600-445f-acfd-6a18cf9338d2Builds on14
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy PerspectiveDaixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, Xuekai Zhu, Bo Dai et al.AAAI 2026 · 216 citations
- The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM ReasoningXinyu Zhu, Mengzhou Xia, Zhepei Wei, Wei-Lin Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 177 citations
- Act Only When It Pays: Efficient Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning via Selective RolloutsHaizhong Zheng, Yang Zhou, Brian R. Bartoldson, Bhavya Kailkhura et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 125 citations
Related papers
- Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning IncentivizationQingyang Zhang, Haitao Wu, Changqing Zhang, Peilin Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 134 citations
- Asymmetric Proximal Policy Optimization: mini-critics boost LLM reasoningJiashun Liu, Johan S. Obando-Ceron, Han Lu, Yancheng He et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- RESTRAIN: From Spurious Votes to Signals - Self-Training RL with Self-PenalizationZhaoning Yu, Zhaolun Su, Leitian Tao, Haozhu Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- XRPO: Pushing the Limits of GRPO with Targeted Exploration and ExploitationUdbhav Bamba, Minghao Fang, Yifan Yu, Haizhong Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 17 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
