From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge
Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, Kai Shu, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu
Abstract
Assessment and evaluation have long been critical challenges in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP). Traditional methods, usually matching-based or small model-based, often fall short in openended and dynamic scenarios. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) inspire the "LLM-as-a-judge" paradigm, where LLMs are leveraged to perform scoring, ranking, or selection for various machine learning evaluation scenarios. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of LLM-based judgment and assessment, offering an in-depth overview to review this evolving field. We first provide the definition from both input and output perspectives. Then we introduce a systematic taxonomy to explore LLM-as-a-judge along three dimensions: what to judge, how to judge, and how to benchmark. Finally, we also highlight key challenges and promising future directions for this emerging area 12 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 06202557-b7e7-428e-9191-6d3fa02371f4Cited by top-tier papers102
- Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Renliang Sun, Yue Huang, Ming Zhong et al.ICLR 2026 · 150 citations
- PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning CapabilitiesHui Wei, Zihao Zhang, Shenghua He, Tian Xia et al.ACL 2025 · 78 citations
- DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking ProcessMinjun Zhu, Yixuan Weng, Linyi Yang, Yue ZhangACL 2025 · 70 citations
- Beyond Pass@ 1: Self-Play with Variational Problem Synthesis Sustains RLVRXiao Liang, Zhong-Zhi Li, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al.ICLR 2026 · 57 citations
- SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningXiao Liang, Zhong-Zhi Li, Yeyun Gong, Yang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 41 citations
Builds on94
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
Related papers
- MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language BenchmarkDongping Chen, Ruoxi Chen, Shilin Zhang, Yaochen Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 345 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and ChallengesZhen Li, Xiaohan Xu, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 17 citations
- JuStRank: Benchmarking LLM Judges for System RankingAriel Gera, Odellia Boni, Yotam Perlitz, Roy Bar-Haim et al.ACL 2025
- WebDevJudge: Evaluating (M)LLMs as Critiques for Web Development QualityChunyang Li, Yilun Zheng, Xinting Huang, Tianqing Fang et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human EvaluationJiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Xiaojie Wang, Huimin Zeng et al.ACL 2026 · 30 citations
