From Fitting Participation to Forging Relationships: The Art of Participatory ML
Ned Cooper, Alexandra Zafiroglu
Abstract
Participatory machine learning (ML) encourages the inclusion of end users and people affected by ML systems in design and development processes. We interviewed 18 participation brokers—individuals who facilitate such inclusion and transform the products of participants’ labour into inputs for an ML artefact or system—across a range of organisational settings and project locations. Our findings demonstrate the inherent challenges of integrating messy contextual information generated through participation with the structured data formats required by ML workflows and the uneven power dynamics in project contexts. We advocate for evolution in the role of brokers to more equitably balance value generated in Participatory ML projects for design and development teams with value created for participants. To move beyond ‘fitting’ participation to existing processes and empower participants to envision alternative futures through ML, brokers must become educators and advocates for end users, while attending to frustration and dissent from indirect stakeholders.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Moving Towards Epistemic Autonomy: A Paradigm Shift for Centering Participant KnowledgeLeah Hope Ajmani, Talia Bhatt, Michael Ann DeVitoCHI 2025 · 16 citations
- Digital Companionship: Overlapping Uses of AI Companions and AI AssistantsAikaterina Manoli, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Ali Ladak, Hayoun Noh et al.CHI 2026 · 7 citations
- Abstraction Alignment: Comparing Model-Learned and Human-Encoded Conceptual RelationshipsAngie W. Boggust, Hyemin Bang, Hendrik Strobelt, Arvind SatyanarayanCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- Funding AI for Good: A Call for Meaningful EngagementHongjin Lin, Anna Kawakami, Catherine D'Ignazio, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Preventing Harmful Data Practices by using Participatory Input to Navigate the Machine Learning MultiverseJan Simson, Fiona Draxler, Samuel Mehr, Christoph KernCHI 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on7
- A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing ResearchNed Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R. Hayes, Courtney Heldreth et al.CHI 2022 · 97 citations
- ORES: Lowering Barriers with Participatory Machine Learning in WikipediaAaron Halfaker, R. Stuart GeigerCSCW 2020 · 84 citations
- The Deskilling of Domain Expertise in AI DevelopmentNithya Sambasivan, Rajesh VeeraraghavanCHI 2022 · 79 citations
- Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry PracticeWesley Hanwen Deng, Bill Boyuan Guo, Alicia DeVrio, Hong Shen et al.CHI 2023 · 73 citations
- Deliberating with AI: Improving Decision-Making for the Future through Participatory AI Design and Stakeholder DeliberationAngie Zhang, Olympia Walker, Kaci Nguyen, Jiajun Dai et al.CSCW 2023 · 71 citations
Related papers
- AutoML in The Wild: Obstacles, Workarounds, and ExpectationsYuan Sun, Qiurong Song, Xinning Gui, Fenglong Ma et al.CHI 2023 · 28 citations
- Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning WorkflowsDoris Xin, Eva Yiwei Wu, Doris Jung Lin Lee, Niloufar Salehi et al.CHI 2021 · 103 citations
- Is a Seat at the Table Enough? Engaging Teachers and Students in Dataset Specification for ML in EducationMei Tan, Hansol Lee, Dakuo Wang, Hari SubramonyamCSCW 2024 · 9 citations
- Six Facets of Facilitation: Participatory Design Facilitators' Perspectives on Their Role and Its RealizationYngve Dahl, Kshitij SharmaCHI 2022 · 30 citations
- Analyzing Collaborative Challenges and Needs of UX Practitioners when Designing with AI/MLMeena Devii Muralikumar, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
