ORES: Lowering Barriers with Participatory Machine Learning in Wikipedia
Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger
Abstract
Algorithmic systems---from rule-based bots to machine learning classifiers---have a long history of supporting the essential work of content moderation and other curation work in peer production projects. From counter-vandalism to task routing, basic machine prediction has allowed open knowledge projects like Wikipedia to scale to the largest encyclopedia in the world, while maintaining quality and consistency. However, conversations about how quality control should work and what role algorithms should play have generally been led by the expert engineers who have the skills and resources to develop and modify these complex algorithmic systems. In this paper, we describe ORES: an algorithmic scoring service that supports real-time scoring of wiki edits using multiple independent classifiers trained on different datasets. ORES decouples several activities that have typically all been performed by engineers: choosing or curating training data, building models to serve predictions, auditing predictions, and developing interfaces or automated agents that act on those predictions. This meta-algorithmic system was designed to open up socio-technical conversations about algorithms in Wikipedia to a broader set of participants. In this paper, we discuss the theoretical mechanisms of social change ORES enables and detail case studies in participatory machine learning around ORES from the 5 years since its deployment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 799d283a-d055-439c-b8d2-91b4af978b0bCited by top-tier papers34
- A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing ResearchNed Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R. Hayes, Courtney Heldreth et al.CHI 2022 · 97 citations
- Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless ServicesTzu-Sheng Kuo, Hong Shen, Jisoo Geum, Nev Jones et al.CHI 2023 · 82 citations
- CASS: Towards Building a Social-Support Chatbot for Online Health CommunityLiuping Wang, Dakuo Wang, Feng Tian, Zhenhui Peng et al.CSCW 2021 · 65 citations
- The Long Road Ahead: Ongoing Challenges in Contributing to Large OSS Organizations and What to DoMariam Guizani, Amreeta Chatterjee, Bianca Trinkenreich, Mary Evelyn May et al.CSCW 2021 · 42 citations
- Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Samir Passi, Mark O. Riedl et al.CSCW 2024 · 41 citations
Builds on2
- Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based SystemsC. Estelle Smith, Bowen Yu, Anjali Srivastava, Aaron Halfaker et al.CHI 2020 · 77 citations
- Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from TorChau Tran, Kaylea Champion, Andrea Forte, Benjamin Mako Hill et al.S&P 2020 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on WikipediaTzu-Sheng Kuo, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Zirui Cheng, Jiwoo Kim et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- Automatically Labeling Low Quality Content on Wikipedia By Leveraging Patterns in Editing BehaviorsSumit Asthana, Sabrina Tobar Thommel, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Nikola BanovicCSCW 2021 · 9 citations
- Detecting Sockpuppetry on Wikipedia Using Meta-LearningLuc Raszewski, Christine de KockACL 2025 · 1 citation
- Effects of Algorithmic Flagging on Fairness: Quasi-experimental Evidence from WikipediaNathan TeBlunthuis, Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron HalfakerCSCW 2021 · 3 citations
- "Nip it in the Bud": Moderation Strategies in Open Source Software Projects and the Role of BotsJane Hsieh, Joselyn Kim, Laura Dabbish, Haiyi ZhuCSCW 2023 · 11 citations
