Funding AI for Good: A Call for Meaningful Engagement
Hongjin Lin, Anna Kawakami, Catherine D'Ignazio, Kenneth Holstein, Krzysztof Z. Gajos
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence for Social Good (AI4SG) is a growing area that explores AI's potential to address social issues, such as public health. Yet prior work has shown limited evidence of its tangible benefits for intended communities, and projects frequently face real-world deployment and sustainability challenges. While existing HCI literature on AI4SG initiatives primarily focuses on the mechanisms of funded projects and their outcomes, much less attention has been given to the upstream funding agendas that influence project approaches. In this work, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of 35 funding documents, representing about $410 million USD in total investments. We uncovered a spectrum of conceptual framings of AI4SG and the approaches that funding rhetoric promoted: from biasing towards technology capacities (more techno-centric) to emphasizing contextual understanding of the social problems at hand alongside technology capacities (more balanced). Drawing on our findings on how funding documents construct AI4SG, we offer recommendations for funders to embed more balanced approaches in future funding call designs. We further discuss implications for how the HCI community can positively shape AI4SG funding design processes.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca81723f-bfa2-415e-bd08-617c40ed3ca9Builds on16
- "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AINithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong et al.CHI 2021 · 725 citations
- The Data-Production DispositifMilagros Miceli, Julian PosadaCSCW 2022 · 117 citations
- Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI EthicsRichmond Y. Wong, Michael A. Madaio, Nick MerrillCSCW 2023 · 108 citations
- A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing ResearchNed Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R. Hayes, Courtney Heldreth et al.CHI 2022 · 97 citations
- Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd WorkCarlos Toxtli, Siddharth Suri, Saiph SavageCSCW 2021 · 91 citations
Related papers
- AI in Global Health: The View from the Front LinesAzra Ismail, Neha KumarCHI 2021 · 60 citations
- "Come to us first": Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good PartnershipsHongjin Lin, Naveena Karusala, Chinasa T. Okolo, Catherine D'Ignazio et al.CSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- Participatory AI Justice in HCI: A Scoping ReviewMaria Luce Lupetti, Cristina Zaga, Nazli CilaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research LandscapeTara Capel, Margot BreretonCHI 2023 · 218 citations
- Towards Better Reflexive Thematic Analysis in HCI: A Scoping Review of Practice at CHIJacob M. Rigby, Ioanna IacovidesCHI 2026 · 6 citations
