Lune

CHI2026Top-tier venue

Rhetoric vs Responsibility: How Tech Companies Shape AI for Accessibility

Aparajita S. Marathe, Quan Zhou, Achi Mishra, Anne Marie Piper

2026Year
2Citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is often framed as a transformative approach for improving accessibility, with major technology companies investing considerable resources into AI applications targeting disabled users. This investment in AI for accessibility has many benefits but remains relatively unquestioned. Through a critical discourse analysis of 126 public-facing blog posts and news articles by leading U.S.-based AI companies, our analysis reveals the ways in which technology companies render different modes of disabled participation, bestow agency upon AI as a competent and capable actor, reinforce their role in shaping AI futures, and legitimize the development of AI for accessibility. By examining tech companies’ AI visions alongside Critical Disability Studies scholarship, we discuss concerns with framing AI as a means to “solve” disability-related challenges while sidestepping deeper structural questions about equity, agency, and responsibility.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get 9c632c7a-1c63-4d4e-bad3-fa1fb6bdd98c

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines