Framing Algorithmic Recourse for Anomaly Detection
Debanjan Datta, Feng Chen, Naren Ramakrishnan
Abstract
The problem of algorithmic recourse has been explored for supervised machine learning models, to provide more interpretable, transparent and robust outcomes from decision support systems. An unexplored area is that of algorithmic recourse for anomaly detection, specifically for tabular data with only discrete feature values. Here the problem is to present a set of counterfactuals that are deemed normal by the underlying anomaly detection model so that applications can utilize this information for explanation purposes or to recommend countermeasures. We present an approach-Context preserving Algorithmic Recourse for Anomalies in Tabular data (CARAT ), that is effective, scalable, and agnostic to the underlying anomaly detection model. CARAT uses a transformer based encoder-decoder model to explain an anomaly by finding features with low likelihood. Subsequently semantically coherent counterfactuals are generated by modifying the highlighted features, using the overall context of features in the anomalous instance(s). Extensive experiments help demonstrate the efficacy of CARAT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5dee71b4-8d21-4d96-9b4a-84eb6e5da9b1Cited by top-tier papers3
- Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal?Philipp Liznerski, Saurabh Varshneya, Ece Calikus, Puyu Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Algorithmic Recourse of In-Context Learning for Tabular DataWenshuo Dong, Jiaming Zhang, Shaopeng Fu, Hongbin Lin et al.ICML 2026
- DCFO: Density-Based Counterfactuals for OutliersTommaso Amico, Pernille Matthews, Lena Krieger, Arthur Zimek et al.KDD 2026
Builds on2
- Beyond Individualized Recourse: Interpretable and Interactive Summaries of Actionable RecoursesKaivalya Rawal, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2020 · 113 citations
- FIMAP: Feature Importance by Minimal Adversarial PerturbationMatt Chapman-Rounds, Umang Bhatt, Erik Pazos, Marc-Andre Schulz et al.AAAI 2021 · 14 citations
Related papers
- ReTabAD: A Benchmark for Restoring Semantic Context in Tabular Anomaly DetectionSanghyu Yoon, Dongmin Kim, Suhee Yoon, Ye Seul Sim et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic RecourseRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2022 · 80 citations
- Learning Models for Actionable RecourseAlexis Ross, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Osbert BastaniNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- AR-Pro: Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Repair with Formal PropertiesXiayan Ji, Anton Xue, Eric Wong, Oleg Sokolsky et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Fascinating Supervisory Signals and Where to Find Them: Deep Anomaly Detection with Scale LearningHongzuo Xu, Yijie Wang, Juhui Wei, Songlei Jian et al.ICML 2023 · 65 citations
