ReTabAD: A Benchmark for Restoring Semantic Context in Tabular Anomaly Detection
Sanghyu Yoon, Dongmin Kim, Suhee Yoon, Ye Seul Sim, Seungdong YOA, Hye-Seung Cho, Soonyoung Lee, Hankook Lee, Woohyung Lim
Abstract
In tabular anomaly detection (AD), textual semantic context often carries critical signals, as the definition of an anomaly is closely tied to domain-specific context. However, existing benchmarks provide only raw data points without semantic context, overlooking rich textual metadata such as feature descriptions and domain knowledge that experts rely on in practice. This limitation restricts research flexibility and prevents models from fully leveraging domain knowledge for detection. ReTabAD addresses this gap by Restoring textual semantics to enable contextaware Tabular Anomaly Detection research. We provide (1) 20 carefully curated tabular datasets enriched with structured textual metadata, together with implementations of state-of-the-art AD algorithms-including classical, deep learning, and LLM-based approaches-and (2) a zero-shot LLM framework that leverages semantic context without task-specific training, establishing a strong baseline for future research. Furthermore, this work provides insights into the role and utility of textual metadata in AD through experiments and analysis. Results show that semantic context improves detection performance and enhances interpretability by supporting domain-aware reasoning. These findings establish ReTabAD as a benchmark for systematic exploration of context-aware AD. The resource is publicly released at https://yoonsanghyu.github.io/ReTabAD/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ed34b796-d97a-4411-b90e-c94304d36f4eBuilds on13
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General DataLiron Bergman, Yedid HoshenICLR 2020 · 412 citations
- A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class ImbalanceMatthew B. A. McDermott, Haoran Zhang, Lasse Hyldig Hansen, Giovanni Angelotti et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 191 citations
- Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond ImagesChen Qiu, Timo Pfrommer, Marius Kloft, Stephan Mandt et al.ICML 2021 · 171 citations
- Anomaly Detection for Tabular Data with Internal Contrastive LearningTom Shenkar, Lior WolfICLR 2022 · 127 citations
Related papers
- AnoLLM: Large Language Models for Tabular Anomaly DetectionChe-Ping Tsai, Ganyu Teng, Phillip Wallis, Wei DingICLR 2025
- LLM as an Algorithmist: Enhancing Anomaly Detectors via Programmatic SynthesisHangting Ye, Jinmeng Li, He Zhao, Mingchen Zhuge et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection MethodsXiangfei Qiu, Zhe Li, Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu et al.VLDB 2025 · 57 citations
- ZeroED: Hybrid Zero-Shot Error Detection Through Large Language Model ReasoningWei Ni, Kaihang Zhang, Xiaoye Miao, Xiangyu Zhao et al.ICDE 2025 · 5 citations
- ICAD-LLM: One-for-All Anomaly Detection via In-Context Learning with Large Language ModelsZhongyuan Wu, Jingyuan Wang, Zexuan Cheng, Yilong Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
