TARDIS: A Foundation of Time-Lock Puzzles in UC
Carsten Baum, Bernardo David, Rafael Dowsley, Jesper Buus Nielsen, Sabine Oechsner
Abstract
Time-based primitives like time-lock puzzles (TLP) are finding widespread use in practical protocols, partially due to the surge of interest in the blockchain space where TLPs and related primitives are perceived to solve many problems. Unfortunately, the security claims are often shaky or plainly wrong since these primitives are used under composition. One reason is that TLPs are inherently not UC secure and time is tricky to model and use in the UC model. On the other hand, just specifying standalone notions of the intended task, left alone correctly using standalone notions like non-malleable TLPs only, might be hard or impossible for the given task. And even when possible a standalone secure primitive is harder to apply securely in practice afterwards as its behavior under composition is unclear. The ideal solution would be a model of TLPs in the UC framework to allow simple modular proofs. In this paper we provide a foundation for proving composable security of practical protocols using time-lock puzzles and related timed primitives in the UC model. We construct UC-secure TLPs based on random oracles and show that using random oracles is necessary. In order to prove security, we provide a simple and abstract way to reason about time in UC protocols. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of this foundation by constructing applications that are interesting in their own right, such as UC-secure two-party computation with output-independent abort.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5d981437-d59f-463e-baf9-043c0931be85Cited by top-tier papers5
- Formalizing Delayed Adaptive Corruptions and the Security of Flooding NetworksChristian Matt, Jesper Buus Nielsen, Søren Eller ThomsenCRYPTO 2022 · 13 citations
- Tidy: Symbolic Verification of Timed Cryptographic ProtocolsGilles Barthe, Ugo Dal Lago, Giulio Malavolta, Itsaka RakotonirinaCCS 2022 · 8 citations
- Efficient CCA Timed Commitments in Class GroupsSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Guilhem Castagnos, Fabien Laguillaumie, Giulio MalavoltaCCS 2021 · 2 citations
- Maliciously-Secure MrNISC in the Plain ModelRex Fernando, Aayush Jain, Ilan KomargodskiEUROCRYPT 2023 · 1 citation
- "Check-Before-you-Solve": Verifiable Time-Lock PuzzlesJiajun Xin, Dimitrios PapadopoulosS&P 2025
Builds on3
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell et al.CCS 2018 · 306 citations
- Efficient Constant-Round MPC with Identifiable Abort and Public VerifiabilityCarsten Baum, Emmanuela Orsini, Peter Scholl, Eduardo Soria-VazquezCRYPTO 2020 · 38 citations
- Generic-Group Delay Functions Require Hidden-Order GroupsLior Rotem, Gil Segev, Ido ShahafEUROCRYPT 2020 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Completeness Theorems for Adaptively Secure BroadcastRan Cohen, Juan A. Garay, Vassilis ZikasCRYPTO 2023 · 8 citations
- Time-Lock Puzzles from LatticesShweta Agrawal, Giulio Malavolta, Tianwei ZhangCRYPTO 2024 · 11 citations
- OpenSquare: Decentralized Repeated Modular Squaring ServiceSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Tiantian Gong, Adithya Bhat, Aniket Kate et al.CCS 2021
- Time-Lock Puzzles with Efficient Batch SolvingJesko Dujmovic, Rachit Garg, Giulio MalavoltaEUROCRYPT 2024 · 9 citations
- Verifiable Timed Signatures Made PracticalSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Adithya Bhat, Giulio Malavolta, Nico Döttling et al.CCS 2020 · 58 citations
