Efficient CCA Timed Commitments in Class Groups
Sri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Guilhem Castagnos, Fabien Laguillaumie, Giulio Malavolta
Abstract
Timed commitments [Boneh and Naor, CRYPTO 2000] are the timed analogue of standard commitments, where the commitment can be non-interactively opened after a pre-specified amount of time passes. Timed commitments have a large spectrum of applications, such as sealed bid auctions, fair contract signing, fair multi-party computation, and cryptocurrency payments. Unfortunately, all practical constructions rely on a (private-coin) trusted setup and do not scale well with the number of participants. These are two severe limiting factors that have hindered the widespread adoption of this primitive. In this work, we set out to resolve these two issues and propose an efficient timed commitment scheme that also satisfies the strong notion of CCA-security. Specifically, our scheme has a transparent (i.e. public-coin) one-time setup and the amount of sequential computation is essentially independent of the number of participants. As a key technical ingredient, we propose the first (linearly) homomorphic time-lock puzzle with a transparent setup, from class groups of imaginary quadratic order. To demonstrate the applicability of our scheme, we use it to construct a new distributed randomness generation protocol, where n parties jointly sample a random string. Our protocol is the first to simultaneously achieve (1) high scalability in the number of participants, (2) transparent one-time setup, (3) lightning speed in the optimistic case where all parties are honest, and (4) ensure that the output random string is unpredictable and unbiased, even when the adversary corrupts parties. To substantiate the practicality of our approach, we implemented our protocol and our experimental evaluation shows that it is fast enough to be used in practice. We also evaluated a heuristic version of the protocol that is at least 3 orders of magnitude more efficient both in terms of communication size and computation time. This makes the protocol suitable for supporting hundreds of participants.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 56a84f7c-5abf-4453-943d-c0c797e61de9Cited by top-tier papers6
- Sharp: Short Relaxed Range ProofsGeoffroy Couteau, Dahmun Goudarzi, Michael Klooß, Michael ReichleCCS 2022 · 14 citations
- SWOOSH: Efficient Lattice-Based Non-Interactive Key ExchangePhillip Gajland, Bor de Kock, Miguel Quaresma, Giulio Malavolta et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- sfOPA: One-Shot Private Aggregation with Single Client Interaction and Its Applications to Federated LearningHarish Karthikeyan, Antigoni PolychroniadouCRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
- Vitārit: Paying for Threshold Services on Bitcoin and FriendsSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Easwar Vivek Mangipudi, Lucjan Hanzlik, Aniket Kate et al.S&P 2025
- "Check-Before-you-Solve": Verifiable Time-Lock PuzzlesJiajun Xin, Dimitrios PapadopoulosS&P 2025
Builds on10
- Doubly-Efficient zkSNARKs Without Trusted SetupRiad S. Wahby, Ioanna Tzialla, Abhi Shelat, Justin Thaler et al.S&P 2018 · 356 citations
- Scalable Bias-Resistant Distributed RandomnessEwa Syta, Philipp Jovanovic, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Nicolas Gailly et al.S&P 2017 · 327 citations
- Transparent SNARKs from DARK CompilersBenedikt Bünz, Ben Fisch, Alan SzepieniecEUROCRYPT 2020 · 240 citations
- Fast Secure Multiparty ECDSA with Practical Distributed Key Generation and Applications to Cryptocurrency CustodyYehuda Lindell, Ariel NofCCS 2018 · 220 citations
- Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA Assumptions: The Multiparty CaseJack Doerner, Yashvanth Kondi, Eysa Lee, Abhi ShelatS&P 2019 · 167 citations
Related papers
- Verifiable Timed Signatures Made PracticalSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Adithya Bhat, Giulio Malavolta, Nico Döttling et al.CCS 2020 · 58 citations
- Timed Commitments and Timed Encryption: Generic Constructions and Instantiations from IsogeniesMingjie Chen, Jonas MeersCRYPTO 2026
- Tempora-Fusion: Time-Lock Puzzle with Efficient Verifiable Homomorphic Linear CombinationAydin Abadi, Jakub K. SzelągCCS 2026
- Tidy: Symbolic Verification of Timed Cryptographic ProtocolsGilles Barthe, Ugo Dal Lago, Giulio Malavolta, Itsaka RakotonirinaCCS 2022 · 8 citations
- Time-Delayed Publicly Verifiable Quantum Computation with Classical VerifiersAmeer Mohammed, Aydin Abadi, Jaffer MahdiCCS 2026
