Generic-Group Delay Functions Require Hidden-Order Groups
Lior Rotem, Gil Segev, Ido Shahaf
Abstract
Despite the fundamental importance of delay functions, underlying both the classic notion of a time-lock puzzle and the more recent notion of a verifiable delay function, the only known delay function that offers both sufficient structure for realizing these two notions and a realistic level of practicality is the ``iterated squaring'' construction of Rivest, Shamir and Wagner. This construction, however, is based on rather strong assumptions in groups of hidden orders, such as the RSA group (which requires a trusted setup) or the class group of an imaginary quadratic number field (which is still somewhat insufficiently explored from the cryptographic perspective). For more than two decades, the challenge of constructing delay functions in groups of known orders, admitting a variety of well-studied instantiations, has eluded the cryptography community.
In this work we prove that there are no constructions of generic-group delay functions in cyclic groups of known orders: We show that for any delay function that does not exploit any particular property of the representation of the underlying group, there exists an attacker that completely breaks the function's sequentiality when given the group's order. As any time-lock puzzle and verifiable delay function give rise to a delay function, our result holds for these two notions we well, and explains the lack of success in resolving the above-mentioned long-standing challenge. Moreover, our result holds even if the underlying group is equipped with a -linear map, for any constant (and even for super-constant values of under certain conditions).
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- To Label, or Not To Label (in Generic Groups)Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2022 · 50 citations
- TARDIS: A Foundation of Time-Lock Puzzles in UCCarsten Baum, Bernardo David, Rafael Dowsley, Jesper Buus Nielsen et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 42 citations
- Practical Statistically-Sound Proofs of Exponentiation in Any GroupCharlotte Hoffmann, Pavel Hubácek, Chethan Kamath, Karen Klein et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 14 citations
- Translating Between the Common Haar Random State Model and the Unitary ModelEli Goldin, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
- The Structured Generic-Group ModelHenry Corrigan-Gibbs, Alexandra Henzinger, David J. WuEUROCRYPT 2026
Related papers
- Generically Speeding-Up Repeated Squaring Is Equivalent to Factoring: Sharp Thresholds for All Generic-Ring Delay FunctionsLior Rotem, Gil SegevCRYPTO 2020 · 22 citations
- Separating Verifiable Delay Functions and Time-Lock PuzzlesHamza Abusalah, Nivesh Aggarwal, Karen Azari, Chethan Kamath et al.EUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
- Breaking Verifiable Delay Functions in the Random Oracle ModelZiyi Guan, Artur Riazanov, Weiqiang YuanCRYPTO 2025 · 3 citations
- Time-Lock Puzzles from LatticesShweta Agrawal, Giulio Malavolta, Tianwei ZhangCRYPTO 2024 · 11 citations
- Continuous Verifiable Delay FunctionsNaomi Ephraim, Cody Freitag, Ilan Komargodski, Rafael PassEUROCRYPT 2020 · 85 citations
