Lune

NeurIPS2023Top-tier venue

Tools for Verifying Neural Models' Training Data

Dami Choi, Yonadav Shavit, David Kristjanson Duvenaud

2023Year
36Citations
7Top-tier citations

Abstract

It is important that consumers and regulators can verify the provenance of large neural models to evaluate their capabilities and risks. We introduce the concept of a "Proof-of-Training-Data": any protocol that allows a model trainer to convince a Verifier of the training data that produced a set of model weights. Such protocols could verify the amount and kind of data and compute used to train the model, including whether it was trained on specific harmful or beneficial data sources. We explore efficient verification strategies for Proof-of-Training-Data that are compatible with most current large-model training procedures. These include a method for the model-trainer to verifiably pre-commit to a random seed used in training, and a method that exploits models' tendency to temporarily overfit to training data in order to detect whether a given data-point was included in training. We show experimentally that our verification procedures can catch a wide variety of attacks, including all known attacks from the Proof-of-Learning literature. Preprint. Under review. *First two authors contributed equally.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 541d7d2b-9be5-4ee2-9b27-21fc879924f2

Cited by top-tier papers7

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on9

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines