Lune

CVPR2025Top-tier venue

Training Data Provenance Verification: Did Your Model Use Synthetic Data from My Generative Model for Training?

Yuechen Xie, Jie Song, Huiqiong Wang, Mingli Song

2025Year
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

High-quality open-source text-to-image models have lowered the threshold for obtaining photorealistic images significantly, but also face potential risks of misuse. Specifically, suspects may use synthetic data generated by these generative models to train models for specific tasks without permission, when lacking real data resources especially. Protecting these generative models is crucial for the wellbeing of their owners. In this work, we propose the first method to this important yet unresolved issue, called Training data Provenance Verification (TrainProVe). The rationale behind TrainProVe is grounded in the principle of generalization error bound, which suggests that, for two models with the same task, if the distance between their training data distributions is smaller, their generalization ability will be closer. We validate the efficacy of Train-ProVe across four text-to-image models (Stable Diffusion v1.4, latent consistency model, and Stable Cascade). The results show that TrainProVe achieves a verification accuracy of over 99% in determining the provenance of suspicious model training data, surpassing all previous methods. Code is available at https://github.com/ xieyc99/TrainProVe .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 9b3e7863-3611-4c16-9385-5c9bcb3a4de2

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on23

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines