PAC-Private Algorithms
Mayuri Sridhar, Hanshen Xiao, Srinivas Devadas
Abstract
Provable privacy typically requires involved analysis and is often associated with unacceptable accuracy loss. While many empirical verification or approximation methods, such as Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) and Differential Privacy Auditing (DPA), have been proposed, these do not offer rigorous privacy guarantees. In this paper, we apply recently-proposed Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Privacy to give formal, mechanized, simulation-based proofs for a range of practical, black-box algorithms: K-Means, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Random Forests. To provide these proofs, we present a new simulation algorithm that efficiently determines anisotropic noise perturbation required for any given level of privacy. We provide a proof of correctness for this algorithm and demonstrate that anisotropic noise has substantive benefits over isotropic noise. Stable algorithms are easier to privatize, and we demonstrate privacy amplification resulting from introducing regularization in these algorithms; meaningful privacy guarantees are obtained with small losses in accuracy. We propose new techniques in order to reduce instability in algorithmic output and convert intractable geometric stability verification into efficient deterministic stability verification. Thorough experiments are included, and we validate our provable adversarial inference hardness against state-of-the-art empirical attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Residual-PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Control Beyond the Gaussian BarrierTao Zhang, Yevgeniy VorobeychikUSENIX Security 2026 · 4 citations
- Trustworthy Machine Learning through Data-Specific IndistinguishabilityHanshen Xiao, Zhen Yang, G. Edward SuhICML 2025
- One-Sided Bounded Noise: Theory, Optimization Algorithms and ApplicationsHanshen Xiao, Jun Wan, Elaine Shi, Srinivas DevadasCCS 2025
- Sliced Rényi Pufferfish Privacy: Tractable Privatization Mechanism and Private Learning with Gradient ClippingTao Zhang, Yevgeniy VorobeychikUSENIX Security 2026
- Privacy-Conscious Algorithm Design Via PAC PrivacyMayuri Sridhar, Xiaochen Zhu, Srinivas DevadasS&P 2026
Builds on10
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial RegularizationMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2018 · 543 citations
- Strong and Efficient Cache Side-Channel Protection using Hardware Transactional MemoryDaniel Gruss, Julian Lettner, Felix Schuster, Olga Ohrimenko et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 254 citations
Related papers
- PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data ProcessingHanshen Xiao, Srinivas DevadasCRYPTO 2023 · 7 citations
- A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine LearningFred Lu, Joseph Munoz, Maya Fuchs, Tyler LeBlond et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Mean-Shift PCA by Knockoff MeanMengda Li, Zeng Li, Jianfeng YaoICML 2026
- Instance-optimality in differential privacy via approximate inverse sensitivity mechanismsHilal Asi, John C. DuchiNeurIPS 2020 · 72 citations
- General-Purpose f-DP Estimation and Auditing in a Black-Box SettingÖnder Askin, Holger Dette, Martin Dunsche, Tim Kutta et al.USENIX Security 2025
