PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processing
Hanshen Xiao, Srinivas Devadas
Abstract
We propose and study a new privacy definition, termed Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Privacy. PAC Privacy characterizes the information-theoretic hardness to recover sensitive data given arbitrary information disclosure/leakage during/after any processing. Unlike the classic cryptographic definition and Differential Privacy (DP), which consider the adversarial (input-independent) worst case, PAC Privacy is a simulatable metric that quantifies the instance-based impossibility of inference. A fully automatic analysis and proof generation framework is proposed: security parameters can be produced with arbitrarily high confidence via Monte-Carlo simulation for any black-box data processing oracle. This appealing automation property enables analysis of complicated data processing, where the worst-case proof in the classic privacy regime could be loose or even intractable. Moreover, we show that the produced PAC Privacy guarantees enjoy simple composition bounds and the automatic analysis framework can be implemented in an online fashion to analyze the composite PAC Privacy loss even under correlated randomness. On the utility side, the magnitude of (necessary) perturbation required in PAC Privacy is not lower bounded by Theta(d) for a d-dimensional release but could be O(1) for many practical data processing tasks, which is in contrast to the input-independent worst-case information-theoretic lower bound. Example applications of PAC Privacy are included with comparisons to existing works.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 66753c82-9682-4484-8d1d-211128e498a7Cited by top-tier papers9
- Residual-PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Control Beyond the Gaussian BarrierTao Zhang, Yevgeniy VorobeychikUSENIX Security 2026 · 4 citations
- Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy–Utility Guarantees for DP-SGDMurat Bilgehan Ertan), Marten van Dijk)CCS 2026 · 3 citations
- Formal Privacy Proof of Data Encoding: The Possibility and Impossibility of Learnable EncryptionHanshen Xiao, G. Edward Suh, Srinivas DevadasCCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Trustworthy Machine Learning through Data-Specific IndistinguishabilityHanshen Xiao, Zhen Yang, G. Edward SuhICML 2025
- PAC-Private AlgorithmsMayuri Sridhar, Hanshen Xiao, Srinivas DevadasS&P 2025
Builds on8
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual InformationPengyu Cheng, Weituo Hao, Shuyang Dai, Jiachang Liu et al.ICML 2020 · 512 citations
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot et al.S&P 2021 · 288 citations
- Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in L1 GeometryHilal Asi, Vitaly Feldman, Tomer Koren, Kunal TalwarICML 2021 · 106 citations
Related papers
- Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information ConstraintPaul Cuff, Lanqing YuCCS 2016 · 226 citations
- Subset-Based Instance Optimality in Private EstimationTravis Dick, Alex Kulesza, Ziteng Sun, Ananda Theertha SureshICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Accuracy-First Rényi Differential Privacy and Post-Processing ImmunityOssi Räisä, Antti Koskela, Antti HonkelaICML 2026
- Statistical Quantification of Differential Privacy: A Local ApproachÖnder Askin, Tim Kutta, Holger DetteS&P 2022 · 19 citations
- Privacy Audit as Bits Transmission: (Im)possibilities for Audit by One RunZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Di WangUSENIX Security 2025
