Privacy-Conscious Algorithm Design Via PAC Privacy
Mayuri Sridhar, Xiaochen Zhu, Srinivas Devadas
Abstract
As the use of algorithms for daily decision-making has grown, so has the need for provable privacy guarantees on their leakage of sensitive data. Classically, privatizing these algorithms is implemented by computing the minimal noise required for a given privacy budget and adding it post-hoc. We instead propose that the algorithm's hyperparameters and its privacy budget can be jointly optimized to improve overall privatized utility. In this work, we focus on designing privacyconscious algorithms; that is, designing near-optimal algorithms, in terms of utility, for a given privacy budget under PAC Privacy.
We integrate the noise required for PAC Privacy guarantees directly into our objective functions for classic algorithms like linear regression and gradient descent. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to optimize for privatized performance under PAC Privacy. We demonstrate how to derive theoretically-optimal parameters to maximize utility under a provided privacy budget. These parameters correspond to regularization strength for linear regression and step sizes for gradient descent optimization of convex and smooth objective functions. We validate our theoretical results experimentally, showing the benefits of privacy-conscious design for ridge regression and regularized logistic regression. Our algorithms maintain near-optimal utility at relaxed privacy budgets and smoothly trade off utility and privacy in stricter settings.
is calibrated appropriately. That is, while the algorithm still uses instance-specific noise computations, it requires tracking 1. Note that Theorem 4.2 of [25], which allows for the harder adversarial setting is no longer black-box -specifically, this theorem requires a universal upper bound on divergence (similar to DP) making it difficult to integrate with privacy-conscious design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive ClippingGalen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop RamaswamyNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
Related papers
- Differentially Private Two-Stage Gradient Descent for Instrumental Variable RegressionHaodong Liang, Yanhao Jin, Krishna Balasubramanian, Lifeng LaiICLR 2026
- Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Ex-Post GuaranteeBadih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Alexander Knop, Ravi Kumar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Eliminating Solution Bias in Differentially Private OptimizationDONGRUN LI, YUN ZENG, Zibo Wei, Jiacheng Wei et al.ICML 2026
- Better Private Linear Regression Through Better Private Feature SelectionTravis Dick, Jennifer Gillenwater, Matthew JosephNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Revisiting Differentially Private Hyper-parameter TuningZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Cheng-Long Wang, Di WangNDSS 2026 · 7 citations
