One-Sided Bounded Noise: Theory, Optimization Algorithms and Applications
Hanshen Xiao, Jun Wan, Elaine Shi, Srinivas Devadas
Abstract
We investigate the optimal trade-off between utility and privacy using one-sided perturbation. Unlike conventional privacy-preserving statistical releases, randomization for obfuscating side-channel information is often constrained by infrastructure limitations. In practical scenarios, these constraints may only allow positive and bounded perturbations. For example, extending processing time or sending and storing dummy messages/data is typically feasible. However, implementing modifications in the opposite direction is challenging due to restrictions imposed by hardware capacity, communication protocols, and data management systems. In this paper, we establish the foundation of the positive noise mechanism within three semantic privacy frameworks: Differential Privacy (DP), Maximal Leakage (MaxL), and Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Privacy. We then present a series of results that characterize or approximate the optimal one-sided noise distribution, subject to a second-moment budget and a bounded maximal magnitude. Building on this theoretical foundation, we develop efficient tools to solve the underlying optimization problems. Through experiments conducted in various scenarios, we demonstrate that existing techniques, such as Truncated Biased Laplace noise, are often suboptimal and result in excessive performance degradation. For instance, in an anonymous communication system with a 250K message budget, our optimized DP noise mechanism achieves a 21× reduction in dummy messages and an 18× reduction in dummy message latency overhead compared to traditional methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- On Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy-tailed DataDi Wang, Hanshen Xiao, Srinivas Devadas, Jinhui XuICML 2020 · 68 citations
- εpsolute: Efficiently Querying Databases While Providing Differential PrivacyDmytro Bogatov, Georgios Kellaris, George Kollios, Kobbi Nissim et al.CCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Metior: A Comprehensive Model to Evaluate Obfuscating Side-Channel Defense SchemesPeter W. Deutsch, Weon Taek Na, Thomas Bourgeat, Joel S. Emer et al.ISCA 2023 · 15 citations
Related papers
- R2DP: A Universal and Automated Approach to Optimizing the Randomization Mechanisms of Differential Privacy for Utility Metrics with No Known Optimal DistributionsMeisam Mohammady, Shangyu Xie, Yuan Hong, Mengyuan Zhang et al.CCS 2020 · 1 citation
- Meeting Utility Constraints in Differential Privacy: A Privacy-Boosting ApproachBo Jiang, Wanrong Zhang, Donghang Lu, Jian Du et al.S&P 2025
- The Laplace Mechanism has optimal utility for differential privacy over continuous queriesNatasha Fernandes, Annabelle McIver, Carroll MorganLICS 2021 · 23 citations
- Privacy Loss of Noise Perturbation via Concentration Analysis of A Product MeasureShuainan Liu, Tianxi Ji, Zhongshuo Fang, Lu Wei et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 2 citations
- The Adverse Effects of Omitting Records in Differential Privacy: How Sampling and Suppression Degrade the Privacy–Utility TradeoffÀlex Miranda-Pascual, Javier Parra-Arnau, Thorsten StrufeUSENIX Security 2026
