OSINT Research Studios: A Flexible Crowdsourcing Framework to Scale Up Open Source Intelligence Investigations
Anirban Mukhopadhyay, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Kurt Luther
Abstract
Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) investigations, which rely entirely on publicly available data such as social media, play an increasingly important role in solving crimes and holding governments accountable. The growing volume of data and complex nature of tasks, however, means there is a pressing need to scale and speed up OSINT investigations. Expert-led crowdsourcing approaches show promise, but tend to either focus on narrow tasks or domains, or require resource-intense, long-term relationships between expert investigators and crowds. We address this gap by providing a flexible framework that enables investigators across domains to enlist crowdsourced support for discovery and verification of OS-INT. We use a design-based research (DBR) approach to develop OSINT Research Studios (ORS), a sociotechnical system in which novice crowds are trained to support professional investigators with complex OSINT investigations. Through our qualitative evaluation, we found that ORS facilitates ethical and effective OSINT investigations across multiple domains. We also discuss broader implications of expert-crowd collaboration and opportunities for future work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- OSINT Clinic: Co-designing AI-Augmented Collaborative OSINT Investigations for Vulnerability AssessmentAnirban Mukhopadhyay, Kurt LutherCHI 2025 · 5 citations
- Ctrl-F-Resist. Practices, Challenges, and Technical Needs of Civil Society Organizations Monitoring the Far-Right OnlineElisabeth Steffen, Helena MihaljevićCSCW 2026
Builds on10
- The Psychological Well-Being of Content Moderators: The Emotional Labor of Commercial Moderation and Avenues for Improving SupportMiriah Steiger, Timir J. Bharucha, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Martin J. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 168 citations
- Birds of a feather don't fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter's Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking programJennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, David G. RandCHI 2022 · 104 citations
- True or False: Studying the Work Practices of Professional Fact-CheckersNicholas Micallef, Vivienne Armacost, Nasir D. Memon, Sameer PatilCSCW 2022 · 71 citations
- On the Misinformation Beat: Understanding the Work of Investigative Journalists Reporting on Problematic Information OnlineMelinda McClure Haughey, Meena Devii Muralikumar, Cameron A. Wood, Kate StarbirdCSCW 2020 · 48 citations
- Towards Understanding and Supporting Journalistic Practices Using Semi-Automated News Discovery ToolsNicholas Diakopoulos, Daniel Trielli, Grace LeeCSCW 2021 · 33 citations
Related papers
- Compete, Collaborate, Investigate: Exploring the Social Structures of Open Source Intelligence InvestigationsYasmine Belghith, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Kurt LutherCHI 2022 · 14 citations
- CrowdSolve: Managing Tensions in an Expert-Led Crowdsourced InvestigationSukrit Venkatagiri, Aakash Gautam, Kurt LutherCSCW 2021 · 21 citations
- OpenCrowd: A Human-AI Collaborative Approach for Finding Social Influencers via Open-Ended Answers AggregationInes Arous, Jie Yang, Mourad Khayati, Philippe Cudré-MaurouxWWW 2020 · 31 citations
- Herding a Deluge of Good Samaritans: How GitHub Projects Respond to Increased AttentionDanaja Maldeniya, Ceren Budak, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Daniel M. RomeroWWW 2020 · 24 citations
- Enabling Efficient Cyber Threat Hunting With Cyber Threat IntelligencePeng Gao, Fei Shao, Xiaoyuan Liu, Xusheng Xiao et al.ICDE 2021 · 124 citations
