OpenCrowd: A Human-AI Collaborative Approach for Finding Social Influencers via Open-Ended Answers Aggregation
Ines Arous, Jie Yang, Mourad Khayati, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux
Abstract
Finding social influencers is a fundamental task in many online applications ranging from brand marketing to opinion mining. Existing methods heavily rely on the availability of expert labels, whose collection is usually a laborious process even for domain experts. Using open-ended questions, crowdsourcing provides a cost-effective way to find a large number of social influencers in a short time. Individual crowd workers, however, only possess fragmented knowledge that is often of low quality.
To tackle those issues, we present OpenCrowd, a unified Bayesian framework that seamlessly incorporates machine learning and crowdsourcing for effectively finding social influencers. To infer a set of influencers, OpenCrowd bootstraps the learning process using a small number of expert labels and then jointly learns a feature-based answer quality model and the reliability of the workers. Model parameters and worker reliability are updated iteratively, allowing their learning processes to benefit from each other until an agreement on the quality of the answers is reached. We derive a principled optimization algorithm based on variational inference with efficient updating rules for learning OpenCrowd parameters. Experimental results on finding social influencers in different domains show that our approach substantially improves the state of the art by 11.5% AUC. Moreover, we empirically show that our approach is particularly useful in finding micro-influencers, who are very directly engaged with smaller audiences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c2afe4a5-5a4a-4745-8820-ce89a787fd5cCited by top-tier papers8
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
- Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content ModerationVivian Lai, Samuel Carton, Rajat Bhatnagar, Q. Vera Liao et al.CHI 2022 · 135 citations
- Human-AI Collaboration for UX Evaluation: Effects of Explanation and SynchronizationMingming Fan, Xianyou Yang, Tsz Tung Yu, Vera Q. Liao et al.CSCW 2022 · 80 citations
- Human-AI Collaboration in a Cooperative Game Setting: Measuring Social Perception and OutcomesZahra Ashktorab, Q. Vera Liao, Casey Dugan, James Johnson et al.CSCW 2020 · 79 citations
- Measuring Annotator Agreement Generally across Complex Structured, Multi-object, and Free-text Annotation TasksAlexander Braylan, Omar Alonso, Matthew LeaseWWW 2022 · 34 citations
Related papers
- CrowdRL: An End-to-End Reinforcement Learning Framework for Data LabellingKaiyu Li, Guoliang Li, Yong Wang, Yan Huang et al.ICDE 2021 · 17 citations
- Crowdsourcing System for Numerical Tasks based on Latent Topic Aware Worker ReliabilityZhuan Shi, Shanyang Jiang, Lan Zhang, Yang Du et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 15 citations
- Crowd Teaching with Imperfect LabelsYao Zhou, Arun Reddy Nelakurthi, Ross Maciejewski, Wei Fan et al.WWW 2020 · 12 citations
- CrowdMOT: Crowdsourcing Strategies for Tracking Multiple Objects in VideosSamreen Anjum, Chi Lin, Danna GurariCSCW 2020 · 5 citations
- Hierarchical Crowdsourcing for Data Labeling with Heterogeneous CrowdHaodi Zhang, Wenxi Huang, Zhenhan Su, Junyang Chen et al.ICDE 2023 · 4 citations
