On the Misinformation Beat: Understanding the Work of Investigative Journalists Reporting on Problematic Information Online
Melinda McClure Haughey, Meena Devii Muralikumar, Cameron A. Wood, Kate Starbird
Abstract
Journalists are increasingly investigating and reporting on problematic online content such as misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories, leading to the creation of a new misinformation beat. The process of collecting, analyzing, and reporting on this kind of data is complex and nuanced. It is especially challenging as online actors attempt to undermine their work. Through in-depth interviews with twelve journalists, we explore how they investigate and report on online misinformation and disinformation. Our findings reveal some of the unique challenges of reporting on this beat, as well as the ways in which reporters overcome those challenges. We highlight and discuss how journalistic values could be better embedded into the design of tools to support their work, the power dynamics between social media companies and journalists, and the promise of collaborations as a way to support and educate journalists on this beat. This work provides contextual knowledge to researchers looking to better support investigative journalists -on the misinformation beat and beyond -as their work becomes more entangled in sociotechnical systems.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9c0940f4-5b51-4274-a216-e3696bc88783Cited by top-tier papers8
- True or False: Studying the Work Practices of Professional Fact-CheckersNicholas Micallef, Vivienne Armacost, Nasir D. Memon, Sameer PatilCSCW 2022 · 71 citations
- Bridging Contextual and Methodological Gaps on the "Misinformation Beat": Insights from Journalist-Researcher Collaborations at SpeedMelinda McClure Haughey, Martina Povolo, Kate StarbirdCHI 2022 · 11 citations
- From Crowd Ratings to Predictive Models of Newsworthiness to Support Science JournalismSachita Nishal, Nicholas DiakopoulosCSCW 2022 · 8 citations
- OSINT Research Studios: A Flexible Crowdsourcing Framework to Scale Up Open Source Intelligence InvestigationsAnirban Mukhopadhyay, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Kurt LutherCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- "Here's Your Evidence": False Consensus in Public Twitter Discussions of COVID-19 ScienceAlexandros Efstratiou, Marina Efstratiou, Satrio Baskoro Yudhoatmojo, Jeremy Blackburn et al.CSCW 2024 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Combating Misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and Responsibilities as Perceived by Journalists, Fact-checkers, and UsersMd Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Yousuf, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Pratyasha Saha et al.CSCW 2020 · 84 citations
- Dungeons & Deepfakes: Using scenario-based role-play to study journalists' behavior towards using AI-based verification tools for video contentSaniat Javid Sohrawardi, Y. Kelly Wu, Andrea Hickerson, Matthew WrightCHI 2024 · 21 citations
- Tactics, Threats & Targets: Modeling Disinformation and its MitigationMuhammad Shujaat Mirza, Labeeba Begum, Liang Niu, Sarah Pardo et al.NDSS 2023
- Navigating Information-Seeking in Conspiratorial Waters: Anti-Trafficking Advocacy and Education Post QAnonRachel E. Moran, Stephen Prochaska, Izzi Grasso, Isabelle SchlegelCSCW 2023 · 3 citations
- Targets of Weaponized Islamophobia: The Impact of Misinformation on the Online Practices of Muslims in the United StatesSadia O. Khan, Tania Ghafourian, Sameer PatilCSCW 2024 · 5 citations
