Compete, Collaborate, Investigate: Exploring the Social Structures of Open Source Intelligence Investigations
Yasmine Belghith, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Kurt Luther
Abstract
Online investigations are increasingly conducted by individuals with diverse skill levels and experiences, with mixed results. Novice investigations often result in vigilantism or doxxing, while expert investigations have greater success rates and fewer mishaps. Many of these experts are involved in a community of practice known as Open Source Intelligence (OSINT), with an ethos and set of techniques for conducting investigations using only publicly available data. Through semi-structured interviews with 14 expert OSINT investigators from nine different organizations, we examine the social dynamics of this community, including the collaboration and competition patterns that underlie their investigations. We also describe investigators’ use of and challenges with existing OSINT tools, and implications for the design of social computing systems to better support crowdsourced investigations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bfade28a-a644-4793-a3db-a848909cb89aCited by top-tier papers5
- 'We Do Not Have the Capacity to Monitor All Media': A Design Case Study on Cyber Situational Awareness in Computer Emergency Response TeamsMarc-André Kaufhold, Thea Riebe, Markus Bayer, Christian ReuterCHI 2024 · 22 citations
- "Can't believe I'm crying over an anime girl": Public Parasocial Grieving and Coping Towards VTuber Graduation and TerminationKen Jen Lee, Piaohong Wang, Zhicong LuCHI 2025 · 7 citations
- OSINT Research Studios: A Flexible Crowdsourcing Framework to Scale Up Open Source Intelligence InvestigationsAnirban Mukhopadhyay, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Kurt LutherCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- OSINT Clinic: Co-designing AI-Augmented Collaborative OSINT Investigations for Vulnerability AssessmentAnirban Mukhopadhyay, Kurt LutherCHI 2025 · 5 citations
- Reexamining Technological Support for Genealogy Research, Collaboration, and EducationFei Shan, Kurt LutherCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Race Yourselves: A Longitudinal Exploration of Self-Competition Between Past, Present, and Future Performances in a VR ExergameAlexander Michael, Christof LutterothCHI 2020 · 54 citations
- HackEd: A Pedagogical Analysis of Online Vulnerability Discovery ExercisesDaniel Votipka, Eric Zhang, Michelle L. MazurekS&P 2021 · 22 citations
- CrowdSolve: Managing Tensions in an Expert-Led Crowdsourced InvestigationSukrit Venkatagiri, Aakash Gautam, Kurt LutherCSCW 2021 · 21 citations
- An Activity Theory Analysis of Search & Rescue Collective Sensemaking and Planning PracticesSultan A. Alharthi, Nicolas James LaLone, Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Igor Dolgov et al.CHI 2021 · 20 citations
Related papers
- On Being an Expert: Habitus as a Lens for Understanding Privacy ExpertiseHouda Elmimouni, Eric P. S. Baumer, Andrea ForteCSCW 2024 · 1 citation
- "Threat modeling is very formal, it's very technical, and also very hard to do correctly": Investigating Threat Modeling Practices in Open-Source Software ProjectsHarjot Kaur, Carson Powers, Ronald E. Thompson III, Sascha Fahl et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Help Me #DebunkThis: Unpacking Individual and Community's Collaborative Work in Information Credibility AssessmentLu He, Changyang HeCSCW 2022 · 16 citations
- Committed to Trust: A Qualitative Study on Security & Trust in Open Source Software ProjectsDominik Wermke, Noah Wöhler, Jan H. Klemmer, Marcel Fourné et al.S&P 2022 · 54 citations
- An Interview Study on Third-Party Cyber Threat Hunting Processes in the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityWilliam P. Maxam III, James C. DavisUSENIX Security 2024 · 14 citations
