Toxicity in Online Games: The Prevalence and Efficacy of Coping Strategies
Julian Frommel, Regan L. Mandryk
Abstract
Toxicity is pervasive in online multiplayer games, exposing players to disruptive and harmful behaviours. Players employ various approaches to cope with exposure to toxicity; however, game designers and researchers lack guidance on how to implement coping support within games. In this paper, we first conduct a formative study to collect a comprehensive list of coping approaches from toxicity literature and use affinity mapping to identify overarching game-based coping strategies. Then, we report findings from a survey (n = 85) on players’ experiences with toxicity, how they employ the identified coping strategies, how games support coping, and their general coping styles. Our paper contributes a framework for coping strategies to deal with game-based toxicity and provides insights into the prevalence of these strategies among players and factors that affect their usage and effectiveness. These findings can be used to guide better in-game tools that help players mitigate the harm caused by toxicity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 48abbbe5-dd88-478d-9854-c8f64a1ce52bCited by top-tier papers2
- Don't Hit The Wall, Just Squeeze The Ball: How Tangible Interactive Devices Can Help Manage Frustration In Online GamesMichel Wijkstra, Remco C. Veltkamp, Julian FrommelCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "I Don't Have Faith in The Developers to Use My Feedback": Understanding Player Values and Expectancy for Reporting Systems in Video GamesMichael Yin, Chenxinran Shen, Robert XiaoCSCW 2026
Builds on6
- Don't You Know That You're Toxic: Normalization of Toxicity in Online GamingNicole A. Beres, Julian Frommel, Elizabeth Reid, Regan L. Mandryk et al.CHI 2021 · 235 citations
- See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil: How Collegiate Players Define, Experience and Cope with ToxicitySelen Türkay, Jessica Formosa, Sonam Adinolf, Robert Cuthbert et al.CHI 2020 · 126 citations
- Flag and Flaggability in Automated Moderation: The Case of Reporting Toxic Behavior in an Online Game CommunityYubo Kou, Xinning GuiCHI 2021 · 85 citations
- Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity AnnotationNitesh Goyal, Ian D. Kivlichan, Rachel Rosen, Lucy VassermanCSCW 2022 · 74 citations
- "They Just Don't Get It": Towards Social Technologies for Coping with Interpersonal RacismAlexandra To, Wenxia Sweeney, Jessica Hammer, Geoff KaufmanCSCW 2020 · 64 citations
Related papers
- The Ethics of Multiplayer Game Design and Community Management: Industry Perspectives and ChallengesLucy A. Sparrow, Martin R. Gibbs, Michael Victor ArnoldCHI 2021 · 46 citations
- Designed for Hostility? Toxic Behavior and Ambivalent Game Elements in Online Multiplayer Game GenresBastian KordyakaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Traumatizing or Just Annoying? Unveiling the Spectrum of Gamer Toxicity in the StarCraft II CommunitySamuli Laato, Bastian Kordyaka, Juho HamariCHI 2024 · 22 citations
- Transparency, Fairness, and Coping: How Players Experience Moderation in Multiplayer Online GamesRenkai Ma, Yao Li, Yubo KouCHI 2023 · 23 citations
- Exploring Aggressors' In‑Match Cognitive and Emotional Formation and Toxic Behavior Trajectories in MOBA GamesKangyu Yuan, Hanfang Lyu, Runhua Zhang, Hansika Murugu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
