"I Don't Have Faith in The Developers to Use My Feedback": Understanding Player Values and Expectancy for Reporting Systems in Video Games
Michael Yin, Chenxinran Shen, Robert Xiao
Abstract
Reporting systems in multiplayer video games allow players to express their dissatisfaction with others and combat in-game toxicity. In this work, we examined the act of reporting through the lens of expectancy-value theory. Using a distributed survey (n = 98) and follow-up interviews (n = 19), we explored the value players place on reporting, their desired outcomes, and their expectations that these outcomes will be achieved. Our findings revealed that reporting is motivated by both altruistic and retributive factors, with players seeking short-term revenge while also looking to foster an improved long-term community. Yet, players felt that reporting may not always meet these goals, with belief in the system being mediated by factors such as developer reputation, reporting transparency, and alignment with the community. By understanding the value and expectancy of reporting systems, we discuss their implications on broader digital moderation and consider current and potential future designs of reporting systems.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 70d7b72a-ace5-4949-9320-e2f668ad1f3dBuilds on10
- Don't You Know That You're Toxic: Normalization of Toxicity in Online GamingNicole A. Beres, Julian Frommel, Elizabeth Reid, Regan L. Mandryk et al.CHI 2021 · 235 citations
- Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content ModerationVivian Lai, Samuel Carton, Rajat Bhatnagar, Q. Vera Liao et al.CHI 2022 · 135 citations
- See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil: How Collegiate Players Define, Experience and Cope with ToxicitySelen Türkay, Jessica Formosa, Sonam Adinolf, Robert Cuthbert et al.CHI 2020 · 126 citations
- Flag and Flaggability in Automated Moderation: The Case of Reporting Toxic Behavior in an Online Game CommunityYubo Kou, Xinning GuiCHI 2021 · 85 citations
- How Do Users Experience Moderation?: A Systematic Literature ReviewRenkai Ma, Yue You, Xinning Gui, Yubo KouCSCW 2023 · 45 citations
Related papers
- Transparency, Fairness, and Coping: How Players Experience Moderation in Multiplayer Online GamesRenkai Ma, Yao Li, Yubo KouCHI 2023 · 23 citations
- Explainable Moderation in Multiplayer Games: Player Responses to Explanations of an Automated Temporary Ban: Player Responses to Explanations of an Automated Temporary BanTimothy Holland, Lucy A. Sparrow, Wally Smith, Sarah WebberCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Less Talk, More Trust: Understanding Players' In-game Assessment of Communication Processes in League of LegendsJuhoon Lee, Seoyoung Kim, Yeon Su Park, Juho Kim et al.CHI 2025 · 9 citations
- The Ethics of Multiplayer Game Design and Community Management: Industry Perspectives and ChallengesLucy A. Sparrow, Martin R. Gibbs, Michael Victor ArnoldCHI 2021 · 46 citations
- Designed for Hostility? Toxic Behavior and Ambivalent Game Elements in Online Multiplayer Game GenresBastian KordyakaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
