HyQSAT: A Hybrid Approach for 3-SAT Problems by Integrating Quantum Annealer with CDCL
Siwei Tan, Mingqian Yu, Andre Python, Yongheng Shang, Tingting Li, Liqiang Lu, Jianwei Yin
Abstract
Propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) is represented in a conjunctive normal form with multiple clauses, which is an important non-deterministic polynomial-time (NP) complete problem that plays a major role in various applications including artificial intelligence, graph colouring, and circuit analysis. Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising methodology for solving complex SAT problems by exploiting the parallelism of quantum entanglement, where the SAT variables are embedded to the qubits. However, the long embedding time fundamentally limits existing QA-based methods, leading to inefficient hardware implementation and poor scalability.
In this paper, we propose HyQSAT, a hybrid approach that integrates QA with the classical Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) algorithm to enable end-to-end acceleration for solving SAT problems. Instead of embedding all clauses to QA hardware, we quantitatively estimate the conflict frequency of clauses and apply breadth-first traversal to choose their embedding order. We also consider the hardware topology to maximize the utilization of physical qubits in embedding to QA hardware. Besides, we adjust the embedding coefficients to improve the computation accuracy under qubit noise. Finally, we present how to interpret the satisfaction probability based on QA energy distribution and use this information to guide the CDCL search. Our experiments demonstrate that HyQSAT can effectively support larger-scale SAT problems that are beyond the capability of existing QA approaches, achieve up to 12.62X end-to-end speedup using D-Wave 2000Q compared to the classic CDCL algorithm on Intel E5 CPU, and considerably reduce the QA embedding time from 17.2s to 15.7µs compared to the D-Wave Minorminer algorithm [11].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4712f9e2-8351-4224-9d3a-67f0d7eba527Builds on13
- Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum ComputersPrakash Murali, David C. McKay, Margaret Martonosi, Ali Javadi-AbhariASPLOS 2020 · 253 citations
- QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum CircuitsHanrui Wang, Yongshan Ding, Jiaqi Gu, Yujun Lin et al.HPCA 2022 · 199 citations
- CutQC: using small Quantum computers for large Quantum circuit evaluationsWei Tang, Teague Tomesh, Martin Suchara, Jeffrey Larson et al.ASPLOS 2021 · 159 citations
- Architecting Noisy Intermediate-Scale Trapped Ion Quantum ComputersPrakash Murali, Dripto M. Debroy, Kenneth R. Brown, Margaret MartonosiISCA 2020 · 78 citations
- Can Q-Learning with Graph Networks Learn a Generalizable Branching Heuristic for a SAT Solver?Vitaly Kurin, Saad Godil, Shimon Whiteson, Bryan CatanzaroNeurIPS 2020 · 77 citations
Related papers
- Chameleon-SAT: An Adaptive Boolean Satisfiability Accelerator Using Mixed-Signal In-Memory Computing for Versatile SAT ProblemsIris Ying Chou, Hao Kong, Yi Huang, Jianfeng Zhu et al.DAC 2025
- Boolean Satisfiability via Imitation LearningZewei Zhang, Huan Liu, Yuanhao Yu, Jun Chen et al.ICLR 2026
- A PN-Free Digital 3-SAT Accelerator Using Crossbar Architecture and Frequency-Controlled CountersZhezheng Ren, Chenao Yuan, Yuke Zhang, Shiyu SuHPCA 2026 · 1 citation
- Runtime vs. Extracted Proof Size: An Exponential Gap for CDCL on QBFsOlaf Beyersdorff, Benjamin Böhm, Meena MahajanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- NeuroBack: Improving CDCL SAT Solving using Graph Neural NetworksWenxi Wang, Yang Hu, Mohit Tiwari, Sarfraz Khurshid et al.ICLR 2024 · 25 citations
