CutQC: using small Quantum computers for large Quantum circuit evaluations
Wei Tang, Teague Tomesh, Martin Suchara, Jeffrey Larson, Margaret Martonosi
Abstract
Quantum computing (QC) is a new paradigm offering the potential of exponential speedups over classical computing for certain computational problems. Each additional qubit doubles the size of the computational state space available to a QC algorithm. This exponential scaling underlies QC's power, but today's Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices face significant engineering challenges in scalability. The set of quantum circuits that can be reliably run on NISQ devices is limited by their noisy operations and low qubit counts.
This paper introduces CutQC, a scalable hybrid computing approach that combines classical computers and quantum computers to enable evaluation of quantum circuits that cannot be run on classical or quantum computers alone. CutQC cuts large quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits, allowing them to be executed on smaller quantum devices. Classical postprocessing can then reconstruct the output of the original circuit. This approach offers significant runtime speedup compared with the only viable current alternativeÐpurely classical simulationsÐand demonstrates evaluation of quantum circuits that are larger than the limit of QC or classical simulation. Furthermore, in real-system runs, CutQC achieves much higher quantum circuit evaluation fidelity using small prototype quantum computers than the state-of-the-art large NISQ devices achieve. Overall, this hybrid approach allows users to leverage classical and quantum computing resources to evaluate quantum programs far beyond the reach of either one alone.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 623106f1-430e-4abf-a22f-756ef3da57afCited by top-tier papers23
- QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum CircuitsHanrui Wang, Yongshan Ding, Jiaqi Gu, Yujun Lin et al.HPCA 2022 · 199 citations
- Scaling Superconducting Quantum Computers with Chiplet ArchitecturesKaitlin N. Smith, Gokul Subramanian Ravi, Jonathan M. Baker, Frederic T. ChongMICRO 2022 · 56 citations
- AutoComm: A Framework for Enabling Efficient Communication in Distributed Quantum ProgramsAnbang Wu, Hezi Zhang, Gushu Li, Alireza Shabani et al.MICRO 2022 · 47 citations
- EQC: ensembled quantum computing for variational quantum algorithmsSamuel A. Stein, Nathan Wiebe, Yufei Ding, Bo Peng et al.ISCA 2022 · 46 citations
- MorphQ: Metamorphic Testing of the Qiskit Quantum Computing PlatformMatteo Paltenghi, Michael PradelICSE 2023 · 44 citations
Builds on2
- Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum ComputersPrakash Murali, David C. McKay, Margaret Martonosi, Ali Javadi-AbhariASPLOS 2020 · 253 citations
- Towards Efficient Superconducting Quantum Processor Architecture DesignGushu Li, Yufei Ding, Yuan XieASPLOS 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- QRCC: Evaluating Large Quantum Circuits on Small Quantum Computers through Integrated Qubit Reuse and Circuit CuttingAditya Pawar, Yingheng Li, Zewei Mo, Yanan Guo et al.ASPLOS 2024 · 3 citations
- Quixote: Improving Fidelity of Quantum Program by Independent Execution of Controlled GatesEnhyeok Jang, Seungwoo Choi, Won Woo RoDAC 2023 · 3 citations
- Joint Cutting for Hybrid Schrödinger-Feynman Simulation of Quantum CircuitsLaura S. Herzog, Lukas Burgholzer, Christian Ufrecht, Daniel D. Scherer et al.DAC 2025
- Experimental evaluation of NISQ quantum computers: error measurement, characterization, and implicationsTirthak Patel, Abhay Potharaju, Baolin Li, Rohan Basu Roy et al.SC 2020 · 37 citations
- Empirical evaluation of circuit approximations on noisy quantum devicesEllis Wilson, Frank Mueller, Lindsay Bassman, Costin IancuSC 2021 · 6 citations
