CTRAP: Embedding Collapse Trap to Safeguard Large Language Models from Harmful Fine-Tuning
Biao Yi, Tiansheng Huang, Baolei Zhang, Tong Li, Lihai Nie, Zheli Liu, Li Shen
Abstract
Fine-tuning-as-a-service, while commercially successful for Large Language Model (LLM) providers, exposes models to harmful fine-tuning attacks. As a widely explored defense paradigm against such attacks, unlearning attempts to remove malicious knowledge from LLMs, thereby essentially preventing them from being used to perform malicious tasks. However, we highlight a critical flaw: the powerful general adaptability of LLMs allows them to easily bypass selective unlearning by rapidly relearning or repurposing their capabilities for harmful tasks. To address this fundamental limitation, we propose a paradigm shift: instead of selective removal, we advocate for inducing model collapse--effectively forcing the model to"unlearn everything"--specifically in response to updates characteristic of malicious adaptation. This collapse directly neutralizes the very general capabilities that attackers exploit, tackling the core issue unaddressed by selective unlearning. We introduce the Collapse Trap (CTRAP) as a practical mechanism to implement this concept conditionally. Embedded during alignment, CTRAP pre-configures the model's reaction to subsequent fine-tuning dynamics. If updates during fine-tuning constitute a persistent attempt to reverse safety alignment, the pre-configured trap triggers a progressive degradation of the model's core language modeling abilities, ultimately rendering it inert and useless for the attacker. Crucially, this collapse mechanism remains dormant during benign fine-tuning, ensuring the model's utility and general capabilities are preserved for legitimate users. Extensive empirical results demonstrate that CTRAP effectively counters harmful fine-tuning risks across various LLMs and attack settings, while maintaining high performance in benign scenarios. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CTRAP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 41ef9745-8bab-478a-a732-d541a9c04afcCited by top-tier papers6
- Panacea: Mitigating Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Post-fine-tuning PerturbationYibo Wang, Tiansheng Huang, Li Shen, Huanjin Yao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Adaptive Defense against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Bayesian Data SchedulerZixuan Hu, Li Shen, Zhenyi Wang, Yongxian Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Self-Destructive Language ModelsYuhui Wang, Rongyi Zhu, Ting WangICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient InfluenceQuoc Minh Nguyen, Trung Le, Jing Wu, Anh Tuan Bui et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Token Buncher: Shielding LLMs from Harmful Reinforcement Learning Fine-TuningWeitao Feng, Lixu Wang, Peizhuo Lv, Tianyi Wei et al.CCS 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on24
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
- Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting GenerationYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Mengzhou Xia, Kai Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 481 citations
Related papers
- SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuningZixuan Chen, Weikai Lu, Xin Lin, Ziqian ZengACL 2025
- ThinkTrap: Denial-of-Service Attacks against Black-box LLM Services via Infinite ThinkingYunzhe Li, Jianan Wang, Hongzi Zhu, James Lin et al.NDSS 2026 · 26 citations
- Probing Semantic Insensitivity for Inference-Time Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Large Language ModelXuankun Rong, Wenke Huang, Wenzheng Jiang, Yiming Li et al.AAAI 2026
- OASIS: Mitigating Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks on LLMs via Orthogonal and Adaptive Safety Alignment StrategyJiayu Tang, Guowei Peng, Qiuhao Xie, Yuning Yang et al.ACL 2026
- BackdoorAlign: Mitigating Fine-tuning based Jailbreak Attack with Backdoor Enhanced Safety AlignmentJiongxiao Wang, Jiazhao Li, Yiquan Li, Xiangyu Qi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 47 citations
