SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuning
Zixuan Chen, Weikai Lu, Xin Lin, Ziqian Zeng
Abstract
Open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) often employ safety alignment methods to resist harmful instructions. However, recent research shows that maliciously fine-tuning these LLMs on harmful data can easily bypass these safeguards. To counter this, we theoretically uncover why malicious fine-tuning succeeds and identify potential defense strategies. Building on the theoretical analysis, we introduce the Self-Degraded Defense (SDD) framework. SDD encourages LLMs to produce high-quality but irrelevant responses to harmful prompts. When attackers attempt malicious fine-tuning, the general capability of the LLM aligned by SDD will significantly decrease, rendering it incapable of following harmful instructions. Our experimental results confirm SDD's effectiveness against such attacks. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZeroNLP/SDD .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 91fc9501-0daa-416b-b719-5c28092e9032Cited by top-tier papers6
- Self-Destructive Language ModelsYuhui Wang, Rongyi Zhu, Ting WangICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention SinkGuozhi Liu, Weiwei Lin, Tiansheng Huang, Ruichao Mo et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Training with Honeypots: Reshaping How LLMs Fail Under Adversarial AttacksSamuel Simko, Punya Pandey, Zhijing Jin, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2026
- SGT: Securing Open-Source LLMs Against Malicious Fine-tuning via Safety Guidance TriggerSunguk Shin, Fangzhao Wu, Byung-Jun Lee, Meeyoung Cha et al.ACL 2026
- Toward Safe Quantization-Aware Fine-tuning: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Alignment DegradationYuning Yang, Guowei Peng, Xiurui Xie, Minrui Jiang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- The Risks of Invariant Risk MinimizationElan Rosenfeld, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Andrej RisteskiICLR 2021 · 356 citations
Related papers
- Safety Misalignment Against Large Language ModelsYichen Gong, Delong Ran, Xinlei He, Tianshuo Cong et al.NDSS 2025
- Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks SafetyZihan Guan, Mengxuan Hu, Ronghang Zhu, Sheng Li et al.ICML 2025
- Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language ModelsYongshuo Zong, Ondrej Bohdal, Tingyang Yu, Yongxin Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 140 citations
- Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning AttackTiansheng Huang, Gautam Bhattacharya, Pratik Joshi, Joshua Kimball et al.ICML 2025
- Bleeding Pathways: Vanishing Discriminability in LLM Hidden States Fuels Jailbreak AttacksYingjie Zhang, Tong Liu, Zhe Zhao, Guozhu Meng et al.NDSS 2026 · 5 citations
