Self-Destructive Language Models
Yuhui Wang, Rongyi Zhu, Ting Wang
Abstract
Harmful fine-tuning attacks represent a major threat to the security of large language models (LLMs), allowing adversaries to compromise safety guardrails with minimal harmful data. While existing defenses attempt to reinforce LLM alignment, they fail to address models' inherent `trainability' on harmful data, leaving them vulnerable to stronger attacks with increased learning rates or larger harmful datasets. To overcome this limitation, we introduce SEAM, a novel alignment-enhancing defense that transforms LLMs into self-destructive models with intrinsic resilience to misalignment attempts. Specifically, these models retain their capabilities for legitimate tasks while exhibiting substantial performance degradation when fine-tuned on harmful data. The protection is achieved through a novel loss function that couples the optimization trajectories of benign and harmful data, enhanced with adversarial gradient ascent to amplify the self-destructive effect. To enable practical training, we develop an efficient Hessian-free gradient estimate with theoretical error bounds. Extensive evaluation across LLMs and datasets demonstrates that SEAM creates a no-win situation for adversaries: the self-destructive models achieve state-of-the-art robustness against low-intensity attacks and undergo catastrophic performance collapse under high-intensity attacks, rendering them effectively unusable. The code is available: https://github.com/ZJUWYH/seam (warning: this paper contains potentially harmful content generated by LLMs.)
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19ab71f5-13cd-452a-978c-5227f9d24916Builds on38
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuningZixuan Chen, Weikai Lu, Xin Lin, Ziqian ZengACL 2025
- Bleeding Pathways: Vanishing Discriminability in LLM Hidden States Fuels Jailbreak AttacksYingjie Zhang, Tong Liu, Zhe Zhao, Guozhu Meng et al.NDSS 2026 · 5 citations
- OASIS: Mitigating Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks on LLMs via Orthogonal and Adaptive Safety Alignment StrategyJiayu Tang, Guowei Peng, Qiuhao Xie, Yuning Yang et al.ACL 2026
- Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks SafetyZihan Guan, Mengxuan Hu, Ronghang Zhu, Sheng Li et al.ICML 2025
- Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning AttackTiansheng Huang, Gautam Bhattacharya, Pratik Joshi, Joshua Kimball et al.ICML 2025
