Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient Influence
Quoc Minh Nguyen, Trung Le, Jing Wu, Anh Tuan Bui, Mehrtash Harandi
Abstract
Fine-tuning-as-a-service introduces a threat to Large Language Models' safety when service providers fine-tune their models on poisoned user-submitted datasets, a process known as harmful fine-tuning attacks. In this work, we show that by regularizing the gradient contribution of harmful samples encountered during finetuning, we can effectively mitigate the impact of harmful fine-tuning attacks. To this end, we introduce Antibody, a defense strategy that first ensures robust safety alignment for the model before fine-tuning, and then applies a safety-preservation learning algorithm during fine-tuning. Specifically, in the alignment stage before fine-tuning, we propose optimizing the model to be in a flat loss region with respect to harmful samples, which makes the safety alignment more resilient to subsequent harmful fine-tuning. Then, in the fine-tuning stage, we design a fine-tuning algorithm that applies a weighting scheme to all samples in each training batch to inhibit the model from learning from harmful samples while encouraging learning from benign samples. Experimental results demonstrate that Antibody successfully mitigates harmful fine-tuning attacks while boosting fine-tuning performance on the user-submitted dataset. WARNING: This paper may contain offensive and harmful content.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0a3f06d6-381c-4a39-9ea7-2b3f7635fa44Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on41
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow InstructionsFederico Bianchi, Mirac Suzgun, Giuseppe Attanasio, Paul Röttger et al.ICLR 2024 · 373 citations
Related papers
- Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful PerturbationTiansheng Huang, Sihao Hu, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin et al.ICLR 2025
- Safe Delta: Consistently Preserving Safety when Fine-Tuning LLMs on Diverse DatasetsNing Lu, Shengcai Liu, Jiahao Wu, Weiyu Chen et al.ICML 2025
- Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning AttackTiansheng Huang, Gautam Bhattacharya, Pratik Joshi, Joshua Kimball et al.ICML 2025
- Adaptive Defense against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Bayesian Data SchedulerZixuan Hu, Li Shen, Zhenyi Wang, Yongxian Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Few Tokens, Big Leverage: Preserving Safety Alignment by Constraining Safety Tokens during Fine-tuningGuoli Wang, Haonan Shi, Tu Ouyang, An WangKDD 2026 · 5 citations
