SteerConf: Steering LLMs for Confidence Elicitation
Ziang Zhou, Tianyuan Jin, Jieming Shi, Qing Li
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across diverse domains but often suffer from overconfidence, limiting their reliability in critical applications. We propose SteerConf, a novel framework that systematically steers LLMs' confidence scores to improve their calibration and reliability. SteerConf introduces three key components: (1) a steering prompt strategy that guides LLMs to produce confidence scores in specified directions (e.g., conservative or optimistic) by leveraging prompts with varying steering levels; (2) a steered confidence consistency measure that quantifies alignment across multiple steered confidences to enhance calibration; and (3) a steered confidence calibration method that aggregates confidence scores using consistency measures and applies linear quantization for answer selection. SteerConf operates without additional training or fine-tuning, making it broadly applicable to existing LLMs. Experiments on seven benchmarks spanning professional knowledge, common sense, ethics, and reasoning tasks, using advanced LLM models (GPT-3.5, LLaMA 3, GPT-4), demonstrate that SteerConf significantly outperforms existing methods, often by a significant margin. Our findings highlight the potential of steering the confidence of LLMs to enhance their reliability for safer deployment in real-world applications. The implementation is at https://github.com/scottjiao/SteerConf.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3f6fba57-4bb0-4186-8581-0c9749b8e855Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural NetworksMatthias Minderer, Josip Djolonga, Rob Romijnders, Frances Hubis et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 633 citations
Related papers
- Rewarding Doubt: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Calibrated Confidence Expression of Large Language ModelsDavid Bani-Harouni, Chantal Pellegrini, Paul Stangel, Ege Özsoy et al.ICLR 2026 · 49 citations
- Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample ConsistencyQing Lyu, Kumar Shridhar, Chaitanya Malaviya, Li Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 72 citations
- SaySelf: Teaching LLMs to Express Confidence with Self-Reflective RationalesTianyang Xu, Shujin Wu, Shizhe Diao, Xiaoze Liu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 10 citations
- Confidence-Guided Stepwise Model Routing for Cost-Efficient ReasoningSangmook Lee, Dohyung Kim, Hyukhun Koh, Nakyeong Yang et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Prompting GPT-3 To Be ReliableChenglei Si, Zhe Gan, Zhengyuan Yang, Shuohang Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 68 citations
