Phase Transition from Clean Training to Adversarial Training
Yue Xing, Qifan Song, Guang Cheng
Abstract
Adversarial training is one important algorithm to achieve robust machine learning models. However, numerous empirical results show a great performance degradation from clean training to adversarial training (e.g., 90+% vs 67% testing accuracy on CIFAR-10 dataset), which does not match the theoretical guarantee delivered by the existing studies. Such a gap inspires us to explore the existence of an (asymptotic) phase transition phenomenon with respect to the attack strength: adversarial training is as well behaved as clean training in the small-attack regime, but there is a sharp transition from clean training to adversarial training in the large-attack regime. We validate this conjecture in linear regression models, and conduct comprehensive experiments in deep neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3d669a0a-bafa-4b02-ab9d-9d5d62c84048Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
- Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning StrongerJingfeng Zhang, Xilie Xu, Bo Han, Gang Niu et al.ICML 2020 · 452 citations
- Improving Robustness using Generated DataSven Gowal, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Olivia Wiles, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 384 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial TrainingMaksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2020 · 366 citations
Related papers
- On the Clean Generalization and Robust Overfitting in Adversarial Training from Two Theoretical Views: Representation Complexity and Training DynamicsBinghui Li, Yuanzhi LiICML 2025
- More Data Can Expand The Generalization Gap Between Adversarially Robust and Standard ModelsLin Chen, Yifei Min, Mingrui Zhang, Amin KarbasiICML 2020 · 66 citations
- Why adversarial training can hurt robust accuracyJacob Clarysse, Julia Hörrmann, Fanny YangICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness by Putting More Regularizations on Less Robust SamplesDongyoon Yang, Insung Kong, Yongdai KimICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Over-parameterized Adversarial Training: An Analysis Overcoming the Curse of DimensionalityYi Zhang, Orestis Plevrakis, Simon S. Du, Xingguo Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 56 citations
