On the Clean Generalization and Robust Overfitting in Adversarial Training from Two Theoretical Views: Representation Complexity and Training Dynamics
Binghui Li, Yuanzhi Li
Abstract
Similar to surprising performance in the standard deep learning, deep nets trained by adversarial training also generalize well for unseen clean data (natural data). However, despite adversarial training can achieve low robust training error, there exists a significant robust generalization gap. We call this phenomenon the Clean Generalization and Robust Overfitting (CGRO). In this work, we study the CGRO phenomenon in adversarial training from two views: representation complexity and training dynamics. Specifically, we consider a binary classification setting with N separated training data points. First, we prove that, based on the assumption that we assume there is poly(D)size clean classifier (where D is the data dimension), ReLU net with only Õ(N D) extra parameters is able to leverages robust memorization to achieve the CGRO, while robust classifier still requires exponential representation complexity in worst case. Next, we focus on a structured-data case to analyze training dynamics, where we train a two-layer convolutional network with Õ(N D) width against adversarial perturbation. We then show that a three-stage phase transition occurs during learning process and the network provably converges to robust memorization regime, which thereby results in the CGRO. Besides, we also empirically verify our theoretical analysis by experiments in real-image recognition datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8506d11b-8d21-4fb2-9025-3243d087112fCited by top-tier papers2
- Muon in Associative Memory Learning: Training Dynamics and Scaling LawsKaifei Wang, Binghui Li, Han Zhong, Pinyan Lu et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Toward Understanding Adversarial Distillation: Why Robust Teachers FailHongsin Lee, Hye Won ChungICML 2026
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
Related papers
- Phase Transition from Clean Training to Adversarial TrainingYue Xing, Qifan Song, Guang ChengNeurIPS 2022 · 4 citations
- Exploring Memorization in Adversarial TrainingYinpeng Dong, Ke Xu, Xiao Yang, Tianyu Pang et al.ICLR 2022 · 84 citations
- Why Robust Generalization in Deep Learning is Difficult: Perspective of Expressive PowerBinghui Li, Jikai Jin, Han Zhong, John E. Hopcroft et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 37 citations
- How Benign is Benign Overfitting ?Amartya Sanyal, Puneet K. Dokania, Varun Kanade, Philip H. S. TorrICLR 2021 · 61 citations
- Deep Networks Always Grok and Here is WhyAhmed Imtiaz Humayun, Randall Balestriero, Richard G. BaraniukICML 2024 · 53 citations
