More Data Can Expand The Generalization Gap Between Adversarially Robust and Standard Models
Lin Chen, Yifei Min, Mingrui Zhang, Amin Karbasi
Abstract
Despite remarkable success in practice, modern machine learning models have been found to be susceptible to adversarial attacks that make human-imperceptible perturbations to the data, but result in serious and potentially dangerous prediction errors. To address this issue, practitioners often use adversarial training to learn models that are robust against such attacks at the cost of higher generalization error on unperturbed test sets. The conventional wisdom is that more training data should shrink the gap between the generalization error of adversarially-trained models and standard models. However, we study the training of robust classifiers for both Gaussian and Bernoulli models under attacks, and we prove that more data may actually increase this gap. Furthermore, our theoretical results identify if and when additional data will finally begin to shrink the gap. Lastly, we experimentally demonstrate that our results also hold for linear regression models, which may indicate that this phenomenon occurs more broadly.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 47a40094-d25b-4ac9-9238-ecd358dbcc64Cited by top-tier papers13
- Multiple Descent: Design Your Own Generalization CurveLin Chen, Yifei Min, Mikhail Belkin, Amin KarbasiNeurIPS 2021 · 64 citations
- Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial RobustnessVasu Singla, Songwei Ge, Ronen Basri, David W. JacobsNeurIPS 2021 · 29 citations
- Noise-Adaptive Thompson Sampling for Linear Contextual BanditsRuitu Xu, Yifei Min, Tianhao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
- Why Do Artificially Generated Data Help Adversarial RobustnessYue Xing, Qifan Song, Guang ChengNeurIPS 2022 · 17 citations
- Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum GameAlexander Robey, Fabian Latorre, George J. Pappas, Hamed Hassani et al.ICLR 2024 · 16 citations
Builds on4
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning StrongerJingfeng Zhang, Xilie Xu, Bo Han, Gang Niu et al.ICML 2020 · 452 citations
- Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff between Robustness and AccuracyAditi Raghunathan, Sang Michael Xie, Fanny Yang, John C. Duchi et al.ICML 2020 · 252 citations
- Confidence-Calibrated Adversarial Training: Generalizing to Unseen AttacksDavid Stutz, Matthias Hein, Bernt SchieleICML 2020 · 158 citations
Related papers
- Why adversarial training can hurt robust accuracyJacob Clarysse, Julia Hörrmann, Fanny YangICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Improving Robustness using Generated DataSven Gowal, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Olivia Wiles, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 384 citations
- Phase Transition from Clean Training to Adversarial TrainingYue Xing, Qifan Song, Guang ChengNeurIPS 2022 · 4 citations
- Inequality phenomenon in l∞-adversarial training, and its unrealized threatsRanjie Duan, Yuefeng Chen, Yao Zhu, Xiaojun Jia et al.ICLR 2023
- Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional RobustnessMazda Moayeri, Kiarash Banihashem, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
