Improving Adversarial Robustness by Putting More Regularizations on Less Robust Samples
Dongyoon Yang, Insung Kong, Yongdai Kim
Abstract
Adversarial training, which is to enhance robustness against adversarial attacks, has received much attention because it is easy to generate human-imperceptible perturbations of data to deceive a given deep neural network. In this paper, we propose a new adversarial training algorithm that is theoretically well motivated and empirically superior to other existing algorithms. A novel feature of the proposed algorithm is to apply more regularization to data vulnerable to adversarial attacks than other existing regularization algorithms do. Theoretically, we show that our algorithm can be understood as an algorithm of minimizing the regularized empirical risk motivated from a newly derived upper bound of the robust risk. Numerical experiments illustrate that our proposed algorithm improves the generalization (accuracy on examples) and robustness (accuracy on adversarial attacks) simultaneously to achieve the state-of-the-art performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 79be02ac-01d2-43ca-b60e-09b54abe6f7aCited by top-tier papers5
- Enhancing Adversarial Robustness in Low-Label Regime via Adaptively Weighted Regularization and Knowledge DistillationDongyoon Yang, Insung Kong, Yongdai KimICCV 2023 · 6 citations
- AUTE: Peer-Alignment and Self-Unlearning Boost Adversarial Robustness for Training Ensemble ModelsLifeng Huang, Tian Su, Chengying Gao, Ning Liu et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- On the Adversarial Vulnerability of Label-Free Test-Time AdaptationShahriar Rifat, Jonathan D. Ashdown, Michael J. De Lucia, Ananthram Swami et al.ICLR 2025
- ADBM: Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model for Reliable Adversarial PurificationXiao Li, Wenxuan Sun, Huanran Chen, Qiongxiu Li et al.ICLR 2025
- TAROT: Towards Essentially Domain-Invariant Robustness with Theoretical JustificationDongyoon Yang, Jihu Lee, Yongdai KimCVPR 2025
Builds on14
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training Can Provably Improve Robustness: Theoretical Analysis of Feature Learning Process Under Structured DataBinghui Li, Yuanzhi LiICLR 2025
- Regularized Training and Tight Certification for Randomized Smoothed Classifier with Provable RobustnessHuijie Feng, Chunpeng Wu, Guoyang Chen, Weifeng Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 13 citations
- Learning Universal Adversarial Perturbation by Adversarial ExampleMaosen Li, Yanhua Yang, Kun Wei, Xu Yang et al.AAAI 2022 · 44 citations
- On the Algorithmic Stability of Adversarial TrainingYue Xing, Qifan Song, Guang ChengNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
- Certified Robustness via Dynamic Margin Maximization and Improved Lipschitz RegularizationMahyar Fazlyab, Taha Entesari, Aniket Roy, Rama ChellappaNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
