Constant-Round Blind Classical Verification of Quantum Sampling
Kai-Min Chung, Yi Lee, Han-Hsuan Lin, Xiaodi Wu
Abstract
In a recent breakthrough, Mahadev constructed a classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) protocol for a classical client to delegate decision problems in BQP to an untrusted quantum prover under computational assumptions. In this work, we explore further the feasibility of CVQC with the more general sampling problems in BQP and with the desirable blindness property. We contribute affirmative solutions to both as follows.
• Motivated by the sampling nature of many quantum applications (e.g., quantum algorithms for machine learning and quantum supremacy tasks), we initiate the study of CVQC for quantum sampling problems (denoted by SampBQP). More precisely, in a CVQC protocol for a SampBQP problem, the prover and the verifier are given an input x ∈ 0, 1 n and a quantum circuit C, and the goal of the classical client is to learn a sample from the output z ← C(x) up to a small error, from its interaction with an untrusted prover. We demonstrate its feasibility by constructing a four-message CVQC protocol for SampBQP based on the quantum Learning With Errors assumption.
• The blindness of CVQC protocols refers to a property of the protocol where the prover learns nothing, and hence is blind, about the client's input. It is a highly desirable property that has been intensively studied for the delegation of quantum computation. We provide a simple yet powerful generic compiler that transforms any CVQC protocol to a blind one while preserving its completeness and soundness errors as well as the number of rounds.
Applying our compiler to (a parallel repetition of) Mahadev's CVQC protocol for BQP and our CVQC protocol for SampBQP yields the first constant-round blind CVQC protocol for BQP and SampBQP respectively, with negligible and inverse polynomial soundness errors respectively, and negligible completeness errors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3d57395c-bd0e-4d68-b9f8-0b6113d10514Cited by top-tier papers7
- Obfuscation of Pseudo-Deterministic Quantum CircuitsJames Bartusek, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi YamakawaSTOC 2023 · 23 citations
- Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum ComputationJames Bartusek, Yael Tauman Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 12 citations
- Classical Verification of Quantum Computations in Linear TimeJiayu ZhangFOCS 2022 · 9 citations
- On the Power of Oblivious State PreparationJames Bartusek, Dakshita KhuranaCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
- A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMAJames Bartusek, Jiahui Liu, Giulio MalavoltaEUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Compiled Nonlocal Games from any Trapdoor Claw-Free FunctionKaniuar Bacho, Alexander Kulpe, Giulio Malavolta, Simon Schmidt et al.CRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
- Separating Non-interactive Classical Verification of Quantum Computation from Falsifiable AssumptionsMohammed Barhoush, Tomoyuki Morimae, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2026
- Bounding the Quantum Value of Compiled Nonlocal Games: From CHSH to BQP VerificationAnand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2023 · 18 citations
- Classical Commitments to Quantum StatesSam Gunn, Yael Tauman Kalai, Anand Natarajan, Ági VillányiSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Post-Quantum Multi-Party ComputationAmit Agarwal, James Bartusek, Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 21 citations
