Classical Verification of Quantum Computations in Linear Time
Jiayu Zhang
Abstract
In the quantum computation verification problem, a quantum server wants to convince a client that the output of evaluating a quantum circuit C is some result that it claims. This problem is considered very important both theoretically and practically in quantum computation [1], [2], [3]. The client is considered to be limited in computational power, and one desirable property is that the client can be completely classical, which leads to the classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) problem. In terms of the time complexity of server-side quantum computations (which typically dominate the total time complexity of both the client and the server), the fastest single-server CVQC protocol so far has complexity where is the size of the circuit to be verified and is the security parameter, given by Mahadev [4]. This leads to a similar cubic time blowup in many existing protocols including multiparty quantum computation, zero knowledge and obfuscation [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Considering the preciousness of quantum computation resources, this cubic complexity barrier could be a big obstacle for theoretical and practical development of protocols for these problems.In this work, by developing new techniques, we give a new CVQC protocol with complexity (in terms of the total time complexity of both the client and the server), which is significantly faster than existing protocols. Our protocol is secure in the quantum random oracle model [11] assuming the existence of noisy trapdoor claw-free functions [12], which are both extensively used assumptions in quantum cryptography. Along the way, we also give a new classical channel remote state preparation protocol for states in , another basic primitive in quantum cryptography. Our protocol allows for parallel verifiable preparation of L independently random states in this form (up to a constant overall error and a possibly unbounded server-side simulator), and runs in only O(poly()L) time and constant rounds; for comparison, existing works (even for possibly simpler state families) all require very large or unestimated time and round complexities [13], [14], [15], [16].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 83e23ce0-5a46-4e14-93f3-96a97189d80bCited by top-tier papers7
- Public Key Encryption with Secure Key LeasingShweta Agrawal, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Shota Yamada et al.EUROCRYPT 2023 · 22 citations
- Bounding the Quantum Value of Compiled Nonlocal Games: From CHSH to BQP VerificationAnand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2023 · 18 citations
- Succinct Arguments for QMA from Standard Assumptions via Compiled Nonlocal GamesTony Metger, Anand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2024 · 8 citations
- On the Power of Oblivious State PreparationJames Bartusek, Dakshita KhuranaCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
- Time-Delayed Publicly Verifiable Quantum Computation with Classical VerifiersAmeer Mohammed, Aydin Abadi, Jaffer MahdiCCS 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- Succinct blind Quantum computation using a random oracleJiayu ZhangSTOC 2021 · 4 citations
- Compiled Nonlocal Games from any Trapdoor Claw-Free FunctionKaniuar Bacho, Alexander Kulpe, Giulio Malavolta, Simon Schmidt et al.CRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
- Separating Non-interactive Classical Verification of Quantum Computation from Falsifiable AssumptionsMohammed Barhoush, Tomoyuki Morimae, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2026
- Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum ComputationJames Bartusek, Yael Tauman Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 12 citations
- Secure Multi-party Quantum Computation with a Dishonest MajorityYfke Dulek, Alex B. Grilo, Stacey Jeffery, Christian Majenz et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 41 citations
