On the Power of Oblivious State Preparation
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana
Abstract
We put forth Oblivious State Preparation (OSP) as a cryptographic primitive that unifies techniques developed in the context of a quantum server interacting with a classical client. OSP allows a classical polynomial-time sender to input a choice of one out of two public observables, and a quantum polynomial-time receiver to recover an eigenstate of the corresponding observable -- while keeping the sender's choice hidden from any malicious receiver. We obtain the following results: - The existence of (plain) trapdoor claw-free functions implies OSP, and the existence of dual-mode trapdoor claw-free functions implies round-optimal (two-round) OSP. - OSP implies the existence of proofs of quantumness, test of a qubit, blind classical delegation of quantum computation, and classical verification of quantum computation. - Two-round OSP implies quantum money with classical communication, classically-verifiable position verification, and (additionally assuming classical FHE with log-depth decryption) quantum FHE. Several of these applications were previously only known via tailored LWE-based constructions, whereas our OSP-based constructions yield new results from a wider variety of assumptions, including hard problems on cryptographic group actions. Finally, towards understanding the minimal hardness assumptions required to realize OSP, we prove the following: - OSP implies oblivious transfer between one classical and one quantum party. - Two-round OSP implies public-key encryption with classical keys and ciphertexts. In particular, these results help to ''explain'' the use of public-key cryptography in the known approaches to establishing a ''classical leash'' on a quantum server. For example, combined with a result of Austrin et al. (CRYPTO 22), we conclude that perfectly-correct OSP cannot exist unconditionally in the (quantum) random oracle model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f64cde71-ec5f-412d-b3df-4f9b082e0793Cited by top-tier papers2
- A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMAJames Bartusek, Jiahui Liu, Giulio MalavoltaEUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
- Proofs of No IntrusionVipul Goyal, Justin RaizesEUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Verifiable Quantum Advantage without StructureTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2022 · 35 citations
- Quantum Advantage from Any Non-local GameYael Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Lisa YangSTOC 2023 · 25 citations
- Public-key Quantum money with a classical bankOmri ShmueliSTOC 2022 · 20 citations
- On the Impossibility of Key Agreements from Quantum Random OraclesPer Austrin, Hao Chung, Kai-Min Chung, Shiuan Fu et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 20 citations
- Bounding the Quantum Value of Compiled Nonlocal Games: From CHSH to BQP VerificationAnand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2023 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Hard Quantum Extrapolations in Quantum CryptographyLuowen Qian, Justin Raizes, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2025 · 1 citation
- Quantum State Group ActionsSaachi Mutreja, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
- On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing MeasurementsAlper Çakan, Dakshita Khurana, Tomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa et al.EUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
- Hidden Cosets and Applications to Unclonable CryptographyAndrea Coladangelo, Jiahui Liu, Qipeng Liu, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2021 · 64 citations
- Classical Verification of Quantum Computations in Linear TimeJiayu ZhangFOCS 2022 · 9 citations
