Verifiable Quantum Advantage without Structure
Takashi Yamakawa, Mark Zhandry
Abstract
We show the following hold, unconditionally unless otherwise stated, relative to a random oracle with probability 1: •There are NP search problems solvable by BQP machines but not BPP machines.•There exist functions that are one-way, and even collision resistant, against classical adversaries but are easily inverted quantumly. Similar separations hold for digital signatures and CPA-secure public key encryption (the latter requiring the assumption of a classically CPA-secure encryption scheme). Interestingly, the separation does not necessarily extend to the case of other cryptographic objects such as PRGs.•There are unconditional publicly verifiable proofs of quantumness with the minimal rounds of interaction: for uniform adversaries, the proofs are non-interactive, whereas for non-uniform adversaries the proofs are two message public coin.•Our results do not appear to contradict the Aaronson-Ambanis conjecture. Assuming this conjecture, there exist publicly verifiable certifiable randomness, again with the minimal rounds of interaction.By replacing the random oracle with a concrete cryptographic hash function such as SHA2, we obtain plausible Minicrypt instantiations of the above results. Previous analogous results all required substantial structure, either in terms of highly structured oracles and/or algebraic assumptions in Cryptomania and beyond.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 66590a96-ab4e-401c-b9c3-a588c0fa996dCited by top-tier papers26
- Certified Randomness from Quantum SupremacyScott Aaronson, Shih-Han HungSTOC 2023 · 18 citations
- No Exponential Quantum Speedup for SIS∞ AnymoreRobin Kothari, Ryan O'Donnell, Kewen WuSTOC 2026 · 12 citations
- Quantum Linear Key-Recovery Attacks Using the QFTAndré SchrottenloherCRYPTO 2023 · 12 citations
- Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle ModelAtul Singh Arora, Andrea Coladangelo, Matthew Coudron, Alexandru Gheorghiu et al.STOC 2023 · 11 citations
- Probabilistic Guarantees to Explicit Constructions: Local Properties of Linear CodesFernando Granha Jeronimo, Nikhil ShagrithayaSTOC 2026 · 10 citations
Builds on10
- Classical vs Quantum Random OraclesTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2021 · 43 citations
- Tight Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Function InversionKai-Min Chung, Siyao Guo, Qipeng Liu, Luowen QianFOCS 2020 · 39 citations
- Quantum Advantage from Any Non-local GameYael Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Lisa YangSTOC 2023 · 25 citations
- On the Impossibility of Key Agreements from Quantum Random OraclesPer Austrin, Hao Chung, Kai-Min Chung, Shiuan Fu et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 20 citations
- Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle ModelAtul Singh Arora, Andrea Coladangelo, Matthew Coudron, Alexandru Gheorghiu et al.STOC 2023 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Quantum-Computable One-Way Functions without One-Way FunctionsWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Avishay TalSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Quantum Cryptography in AlgorithmicaWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Makrand Sinha, Avishay TalSTOC 2023 · 47 citations
- Oblivious Transfer Is in MiniQCryptAlex B. Grilo, Huijia Lin, Fang Song, Vinod VaikuntanathanEUROCRYPT 2021 · 56 citations
- Quantum Advantage from One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2024 · 4 citations
- On the Cryptographic Foundations of Interactive Quantum AdvantageKabir Tomer, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2026 · 1 citation
