Classical Commitments to Quantum States
Sam Gunn, Yael Tauman Kalai, Anand Natarajan, Ági Villányi
Abstract
We define the notion of a classical commitment scheme to quantum states, which allows a quantum prover to compute a classical commitment to a quantum state, and later open each qubit of the state in either the standard or the Hadamard basis. Our notion is a strengthening of the measurement protocol from Mahadev (STOC 2018). We construct such a commitment scheme from the post-quantum Learning With Errors (LWE) assumption, and more generally from any noisy trapdoor claw-free function family that has the distributional strong adaptive hardcore bit property (a property that we define in this work). Our scheme is succinct in the sense that the running time of the verifier in the commitment phase depends only on the security parameter (independent of the size of the committed state), and its running time in the opening phase grows only with the number of qubits that are being opened (and the security parameter). As a corollary we obtain a classical succinct argument system for QMA under the post-quantum LWE assumption. Previously, this was only known assuming post-quantum secure indistinguishability obfuscation. As an additional corollary we obtain a generic way of converting any X/Z quantum PCP into a succinct argument system under the quantum hardness of LWE.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7844a8e7-9ed1-45a7-b7d1-d28382fa8607Cited by top-tier papers4
- Succinct Arguments for QMA from Standard Assumptions via Compiled Nonlocal GamesTony Metger, Anand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2024 · 8 citations
- On the Power of Oblivious State PreparationJames Bartusek, Dakshita KhuranaCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
- A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMAJames Bartusek, Jiahui Liu, Giulio MalavoltaEUROCRYPT 2026 · 1 citation
- Time-Delayed Publicly Verifiable Quantum Computation with Classical VerifiersAmeer Mohammed, Aydin Abadi, Jaffer MahdiCCS 2026
Builds on9
- Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding BarrierAlessandro Chiesa, Fermi Ma, Nicholas Spooner, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2021 · 30 citations
- Post-Quantum Zero Knowledge, Revisited or: How to Do Quantum Rewinding UndetectablyAlex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, Nicholas SpoonerFOCS 2022 · 28 citations
- Quantum Advantage from Any Non-local GameYael Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Lisa YangSTOC 2023 · 25 citations
- Obfuscation of Pseudo-Deterministic Quantum CircuitsJames Bartusek, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi YamakawaSTOC 2023 · 23 citations
- Classical Proofs of Quantum KnowledgeThomas Vidick, Tina ZhangEUROCRYPT 2021 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum ComputationJames Bartusek, Yael Tauman Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma et al.CRYPTO 2022 · 12 citations
- Commitments to Quantum StatesSam Gunn, Nathan Ju, Fermi Ma, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2023 · 16 citations
- Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Arguments for QMA, with PreprocessingAndrea Coladangelo, Thomas Vidick, Tina ZhangCRYPTO 2020 · 29 citations
- Separating Non-interactive Classical Verification of Quantum Computation from Falsifiable AssumptionsMohammed Barhoush, Tomoyuki Morimae, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2026
- Post-Quantum Multi-Party ComputationAmit Agarwal, James Bartusek, Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 21 citations
