Stabilizer Bootstrapping: A Recipe for Efficient Agnostic Tomography and Magic Estimation
Sitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi Ye, Zhihan Zhang
Abstract
We study the task of agnostic tomography: given copies of an unknown -qubit state which has fidelity with some state in a given class C, find a state which has fidelity with . We give a new framework, stabilizer bootstrapping, for designing computationally efficient protocols for this task, and use this to get new agnostic tomography protocols for the following classes: • Stabilizer states: We give a protocol that runs in time poly( , answering an open question posed by Grewal, Iyer, Kretschmer, Liang [43] and Anshu and Arunachalam [6]. Previous protocols ran in time exp(Θ( )) or required > cos 2 ( /8). • States with stabilizer dimension -: We give a protocol that runs in time 3 • (2 / ) (log(1/ ) ) , extending recent work on learning quantum states prepared by circuits with few non-Clifford gates, which only applied in the realizable setting where = 1 [33, 40, 49, 66] . • Discrete product states: If C = K ⊗ for some -separated discrete set K of single-qubit states, we give a protocol that runs in time ( / ) ( (1+log(1/ ) )/ ) / 2 . This strictly generalizes a prior guarantee which applied to stabilizer product states [42] . For stabilizer product states, we give a further improved protocol that runs in time ( 2 / 2 ) • (1/ ) (log(1/ ) ) . As a corollary, we give the first protocol for estimating stabilizer fidelity, a standard measure of magic for quantum states, to error in 3 quasipoly(1/ ) time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Learning Stabilizer Structure of Quantum StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2026 · 5 citations
- Polynomial-Time Tolerant Testing Stabilizer StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- Single-Copy Stabilizer TestingMarcel Hinsche, Jonas HelsenSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Improved Bounds for Testing Low Stabilizer Complexity StatesSaeed Mehraban, Mehrdad TahmasbiSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning the Closest Product StateAinesh Bakshi, John Bostanci, William Kretschmer, Zeph Landau et al.STOC 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on10
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 79 citations
- Improved Quantum data analysisCostin Badescu, Ryan O'DonnellSTOC 2021 · 40 citations
- Learning Shallow Quantum CircuitsHsin-Yuan Huang, Yunchao Liu, Michael Broughton, Isaac Kim et al.STOC 2024 · 21 citations
- Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference SamplingSabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel LiangSTOC 2024 · 20 citations
- Learning Quantum Hamiltonians at Any Temperature in Polynomial TimeAinesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin TangSTOC 2024 · 14 citations
Related papers
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 9 citations
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu et al.FOCS 2023 · 12 citations
- On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in LearningSrinivasan Arunachalam, Vojtech Havlícek, Louis SchatzkiNeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
- Triply efficient shadow tomographyRobbie King, David Gosset, Robin Kothari, Ryan BabbushSODA 2025 · 5 citations
- Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariesJoran van Apeldoorn, Arjan Cornelissen, András Gilyén, Giacomo NanniciniSODA 2023 · 34 citations
