Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Sampling
Sabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel Liang
Abstract
We study the complexity of learning quantum states in various models with respect to the stabilizer formalism and obtain the following results: We prove that Ω(n) T-gates are necessary for any Clifford+T circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, an exponential improvement over the previously known bound. This bound is asymptotically tight if linear-time quantum-secure pseudorandom functions exist. Given an n-qubit pure quantum state |ψ⟩ that has fidelity at least τ with some stabilizer state, we give an algorithm that outputs a succinct description of a stabilizer state that witnesses fidelity at least τ − ε. The algorithm uses O(n/(ε2τ4)) samples and exp(O(n/τ4)) / ε2 time. In the regime of τ constant, this algorithm estimates stabilizer fidelity substantially faster than the naive exp(O(n2))-time brute-force algorithm over all stabilizer states. In the special case of τ > cos2(π/8), we show that a modification of the above algorithm runs in polynomial time. We exhibit a tolerant property testing algorithm for stabilizer states. The underlying algorithmic primitive in all of our results is Bell difference sampling. To prove our results, we establish and/or strengthen connections between Bell difference sampling, symplectic Fourier analysis, and graph theory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e964ee8f-4ff1-414a-b00c-d266284ee7d5Cited by top-tier papers9
- Learning Shallow Quantum CircuitsHsin-Yuan Huang, Yunchao Liu, Michael Broughton, Isaac Kim et al.STOC 2024 · 21 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
- Learning Stabilizer Structure of Quantum StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2026 · 5 citations
- Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower BoundsMarcel Hinsche, Zongbo Bao, Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert et al.STOC 2026 · 4 citations
- Stabilizer Bootstrapping: A Recipe for Efficient Agnostic Tomography and Magic EstimationSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi Ye, Zhihan ZhangSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on9
- Cryptography from Pseudorandom Quantum StatesPrabhanjan Ananth, Luowen Qian, Henry YuenCRYPTO 2022 · 78 citations
- Quantum Commitments and Signatures Without One-Way FunctionsTomoyuki Morimae, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2022 · 74 citations
- One-Way Functions Imply Secure Computation in a Quantum WorldJames Bartusek, Andrea Coladangelo, Dakshita Khurana, Fermi MaCRYPTO 2021 · 57 citations
- Oblivious Transfer Is in MiniQCryptAlex B. Grilo, Huijia Lin, Fang Song, Vinod VaikuntanathanEUROCRYPT 2021 · 56 citations
- Quantum Cryptography in AlgorithmicaWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Makrand Sinha, Avishay TalSTOC 2023 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Improved Bounds for Testing Low Stabilizer Complexity StatesSaeed Mehraban, Mehrdad TahmasbiSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Single-Copy Stabilizer TestingMarcel Hinsche, Jonas HelsenSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Polynomial-Time Tolerant Testing Stabilizer StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- Quantum learning algorithms imply circuit lower boundsSrinivasan Arunachalam, Alex B. Grilo, Tom Gur, Igor C. Oliveira et al.FOCS 2021 · 6 citations
- Quadratic Lower Bounds on the Approximate Stabilizer Rank: A Probabilistic ApproachSaeed Mehraban, Mehrdad TahmasbiSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
