Learning Stabilizer Structure of Quantum States
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt
Abstract
We consider the task of learning a structured stabilizer decomposition of an arbitrary n-qubit quantum state |ψ⟩: for every ε > 0, output a succinctly describable state |ϕ⟩ with stabilizerrank poly(1/ε) such that |ψ⟩ = |ϕ⟩ + |ϕ ′ ⟩ where |ϕ ′ ⟩ has stabilizer fidelity at most ε. We firstly show the existence of such decompositions using the inverse theorem for the Gowers-3 norm of quantum states that was recently established [AD25, STOC'25].
Algorithmizing the inverse theorem is key to learning such a decomposition. To this end, we initiate the task of self-correction of a state |ψ⟩ with respect to the class of states C: given copies of |ψ⟩ which has fidelity ≥ τ with a state in C, output |ϕ⟩ ∈ C with fidelity |⟨ϕ|ψ⟩| 2 ≥ Ω(τ C ) for some constant C > 1. Assuming the algorithmic polynomial Frieman-Rusza (APFR) conjecture in the high-doubling regime (whose combinatorial version was resolved in a recent breakthrough [GGMT25, Annals of Math.'25]), we give a poly(n, 1/ε)-time algorithm for selfcorrection of stabilizer states.
Given access to the state preparation unitary U ψ for |ψ⟩ and its controlled version conU ψ , we give a poly(n, 1/ε)-time protocol that learns a structured stabilizer decomposition of |ψ⟩. Without assuming APFR, we give a poly(n, (1/ε) log 1/ε )-time protocol for the same task. Our techniques extend to finding structured decompositions over high stabilizer-dimension states, by giving a new tolerant tester for these states.
As our main application, we give learning algorithms for states |ψ⟩ promised to have stabilizer extent ξ, given access to U ψ and conU ψ . We give a protocol that outputs |ϕ⟩ which is constantclose to |ψ⟩ in time poly(n, ξ log ξ ), which can be improved to poly(n, ξ) assuming APFR. This gives an unconditional learning algorithm for stabilizer-rank κ states in time poly(n, κ κ 2 ). As far as we know, efficient learning arbitrary states with even stabilizer-rank κ ≥ 2 was unknown.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- Improved bounds for the sunflower lemmaRyan Alweiss, Shachar Lovett, Kewen Wu, Jiapeng ZhangSTOC 2020 · 36 citations
- Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariesJoran van Apeldoorn, Arjan Cornelissen, András Gilyén, Giacomo NanniciniSODA 2023 · 34 citations
- Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference SamplingSabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel LiangSTOC 2024 · 20 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
- Triply efficient shadow tomographyRobbie King, David Gosset, Robin Kothari, Ryan BabbushSODA 2025 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Polynomial-Time Tolerant Testing Stabilizer StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- Cubic Goldreich-LevinDain Kim, Anqi Li, Jonathan TidorSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Stabilizer Bootstrapping: A Recipe for Efficient Agnostic Tomography and Magic EstimationSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi Ye, Zhihan ZhangSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- Improved Bounds for Testing Low Stabilizer Complexity StatesSaeed Mehraban, Mehrdad TahmasbiSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower BoundsMarcel Hinsche, Zongbo Bao, Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert et al.STOC 2026 · 4 citations
