A Systematic Literature Review on Equity and Technology in HCI and Fairness: Navigating the Complexities and Nuances of Equity Research
Seyun Kim, Yuanchen Bai, Haiyi Zhu, Motahhare Eslami
Abstract
Equity is crucial to the ethical implications in technology development. However, implementing equity in practice comes with complexities and nuances. In response, the research community, especially the humancomputer interaction (HCI) and Fairness community, has endeavored to integrate equity into technology design, addressing issues of societal inequities. With such increasing efforts, it is yet unclear why and how researchers discuss equity and its integration into technology, what research has been conducted, and what gaps need to be addressed. We conducted a systematic literature review on equity and technology, collecting and analyzing 202 papers published in HCI and Fairness-focused venues. Amidst the substantial growth of relevant publications within the past four years, we deliver three main contributions: (1) we elaborate a comprehensive understanding researchers' motivations for studying equity and technology, (2) we illustrate the different equity definitions and frameworks utilized to discuss equity, (3) we characterize the key themes addressing interventions as well as tensions and trade-offs when advancing and integrating equity to technology. Based on our findings, we elaborate an equity framework for researchers who seek to address existing gaps and advance equity in technology.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 36febfff-3fb0-41d4-86ad-959c3ec65d9dCited by top-tier papers2
- Do Teachers Dream of GenAI Widening Educational (In)equality? Envisioning the Future of K-12 GenAI Education from Global Teachers' PerspectivesRuiwei Xiao, Qing Xiao, Xinying Hou, Phenyo Phemelo Moletsane et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- "I think this is fair": Uncovering the Complexities of Stakeholder Decision-Making in AI Fairness AssessmentLin Luo, Yuri Nakao, Mathieu Chollet, Hiroya Inakoshi et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on50
- Critical Race Theory for HCIIhudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D. R. Smith, Alexandra To, Kentaro ToyamaCHI 2020 · 397 citations
- Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray AreasOliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, Andrea WegnerCSCW 2021 · 287 citations
- Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm AuditsJack BandyCSCW 2021 · 190 citations
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 156 citations
- Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for SupportMichael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CSCW 2022 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Examining Identity as a Variable of Health Technology Research for Older Adults: A Systematic ReviewChristina N. Harrington, Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Kirsten E. BrayCHI 2022 · 40 citations
- Privacy Research with Marginalized Groups: What We Know, What's Needed, and What's NextShruti Sannon, Andrea ForteCSCW 2022 · 66 citations
- Participatory AI Justice in HCI: A Scoping ReviewMaria Luce Lupetti, Cristina Zaga, Nazli CilaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Social Justice in HCI: A Systematic Literature ReviewIshita Chordia, Leya Breanna Baltaxe-Admony, Ashley Boone, Alyssa Sheehan et al.CHI 2024 · 64 citations
- Data and Technology for Equitable Public Administration: Understanding City Government Employees' Challenges and NeedsAngie Zhang, Madison Liao, Elizaveta Kravchenko, Marshanah Taylor et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
