Why, when, and from whom: considerations for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data in HCI
Yiqun T. Chen, Angela D. R. Smith, Katharina Reinecke, Alexandra To
Abstract
Engaging diverse participants in HCI research is critical for creating safe, inclusive, and equitable technology. However, there is a lack of guidelines on when, why, and how HCI researchers collect study participants’ race and ethnicity. Our paper aims to take the first step toward such guidelines by providing a systematic review and discussion of the status quo of race and ethnicity data collection in HCI. Through an analysis of 2016–2021 CHI proceedings and a survey with 15 authors who published in these proceedings, we found that reporting race and ethnicity of participants is very rare (<3%) and that researchers are far from consensus. Drawing from multidisciplinary literature and our findings, we devise considerations for HCI researchers to decide why, when, and from whom to collect race and ethnicity data. For truly inclusive, equitable technologies, we encourage deliberate decisions rather than default omissions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Small, Medium, Large? A Meta-Study of Effect Sizes at CHI to Aid Interpretation of Effect Sizes and Power CalculationAnna-Marie Ortloff, Florin Martius, Mischa Meier, Theo Raimbault et al.CHI 2025 · 17 citations
- "Customization is Key": Reconfigurable Textual Tokens for Accessible Data VisualizationsShuli Jones, Isabella Pedraza Pineros, Daniel Hajas, Jonathan Zong et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
- Collecting Qualitative Data at Scale with Large Language Models: A Case StudyAlejandro Cuevas Villalba, Jennifer V. Scurrell, Eva Maxfield Brown, Jason Entenmann et al.CSCW 2025 · 14 citations
- The Cruel Optimism of Tech Work: Tech Workers' Affective Attachments in the Aftermath of 2022-23 Tech LayoffsSamuel So, Vannary Sou, Sean A. Munson, Sucheta GhoshalCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- AtelierEval: Agentic Evaluation of Humans & LLMs as Text-to-Image PromptersHanjun Luo, Zhimu Huang, Sylvia Chung Yan Shan, Yiran Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on16
- Critical Race Theory for HCIIhudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D. R. Smith, Alexandra To, Kentaro ToyamaCHI 2020 · 397 citations
- How WEIRD is CHI?Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau et al.CHI 2021 · 254 citations
- Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-DesignChristina N. Harrington, Tawanna R. DillahuntCHI 2021 · 171 citations
- Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural MistrustMin Kyung Lee, Katherine RichCHI 2021 · 135 citations
- "All that You Touch, You Change": Expanding the Canon of Speculative Design Towards Black FuturingChristina N. Harrington, Shamika Klassen, Yolanda A. RankinCHI 2022 · 89 citations
Related papers
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard et al.CHI 2021 · 51 citations
- Examining Identity as a Variable of Health Technology Research for Older Adults: A Systematic ReviewChristina N. Harrington, Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Kirsten E. BrayCHI 2022 · 40 citations
- Observations on Virtual Reality Avatar Alignment with Research Participants' Skin Tone and GenderKristin A. Bartlett, Claudia KrogmeierIEEE VR 2025 · 5 citations
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIJordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed R. Brubaker et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- Social Justice in HCI: A Systematic Literature ReviewIshita Chordia, Leya Breanna Baltaxe-Admony, Ashley Boone, Alyssa Sheehan et al.CHI 2024 · 64 citations
