Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural Mistrust
Min Kyung Lee, Katherine Rich
Abstract
Emerging research suggests that people trust algorithmic decisions less than human decisions. However, different populations, particularly in marginalized communities, may have different levels of trust in human decision-makers. Do people who mistrust human decision-makers perceive human decisions to be more trustworthy and fairer than algorithmic decisions? Or do they trust algorithmic decisions as much as or more than human decisions? We examine the role of mistrust in human systems in people's perceptions of algorithmic decisions. We focus on healthcare Artificial Intelligence (AI), group-based medical mistrust, and Black people in the United States. We conducted a between-subjects online experiment to examine people's perceptions of skin cancer screening decisions made by an AI versus a human physician depending on their medical mistrust, and we conducted interviews to understand how to cultivate trust in healthcare AI. Our findings highlight that research around human experiences of AI should consider critical differences in social groups.
• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers20
- Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A Case Study in Sepsis DiagnosisShao Zhang, Jianing Yu, Xuhai Xu, Changchang Yin et al.CHI 2024 · 95 citations
- "Because AI is 100% right and safe": User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in IndiaShivani Kapania, Oliver Siy, Gabe Clapper, Azhagu Meena SP et al.CHI 2022 · 90 citations
- How Culture Shapes What People Want From AIXiao Ge, Chunchen Xu, Daigo Misaki, Hazel Rose Markus et al.CHI 2024 · 88 citations
- Will AI Console Me when I Lose my Pet? Understanding Perceptions of AI-Mediated Email WritingYihe Liu, Anushk Mittal, Diyi Yang, Amy S. BruckmanCHI 2022 · 86 citations
- Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and DesiderataAmy Heger, Liz B. Marquis, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Hanna M. Wallach et al.CSCW 2022 · 58 citations
Builds on2
- "They Just Don't Get It": Towards Social Technologies for Coping with Interpersonal RacismAlexandra To, Wenxia Sweeney, Jessica Hammer, Geoff KaufmanCSCW 2020 · 64 citations
- Do I Look Like a Criminal? Examining how Race Presentation Impacts Human Judgement of RecidivismKeri Mallari, Kori Inkpen, Paul Johns, Sarah Tan et al.CHI 2020 · 23 citations
Related papers
- Promise or Peril? Exploring Black Adults' Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health ContextsAndrea G. Parker, Laura M. Vardoulakis, Christina N. HarringtonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Designing with Medical Mistrust: Perspectives from Black Older Adults in Publicly Subsidized HousingCynthia M. Baseman, Reeda Shimaz Huda, Rosa I. ArriagaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is MadeOleksandra Vereschak, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste CaramiauxCHI 2024 · 31 citations
- People Perceive Algorithmic Assessments as Less Fair and Trustworthy Than Identical Human AssessmentsLillio Mok, Sasha Nanda, Ashton AndersonCSCW 2023 · 18 citations
- Who is Trusted for a Second Opinion? Comparing Collective Advice from a Medical AI and Physicians in Biopsy Decisions After Mammography ScreeningHenrik H. J. Detjen, Lars Densky, Niklas von Kalckreuth, Marvin KopkaCHI 2025 · 12 citations
